For Walky

goal of the day . . . ruin the boardie of the year thread(s).
walkonby wrote:
stay classy duck dynasty

http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/tv-movies/duck-dynasty-phil-robertson-equates-homosexuality-bestiality-article-1.1551556

paula deen and her lost empire . . . is laughing


Not sure exactly the point you are attempting to make here, but I fail to see anything un-classy about the following…

"?It seems like, to me, a vagina?as a man?would be more desirable than a man?s anus. That?s just me. I?m just thinking: There?s more there! She?s got more to offer. I mean, come on, dudes! You know what I?m saying? But hey, sin: It?s not logical, my man. It?s just not logical.?

Also I fail to see anything that is "equating homosexuality with bestiality" as the headline erroneously states or anything that is an "anti gay tirade" as Yahoo describe this.

walkonby wrote:
goal of the day . . . ruin the boardie of the year thread(s).


I could probably help you out with that one without trying very hard at all! :)
RatBastard wrote:
walkonby wrote:
stay classy duck dynasty

http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/tv-movies/duck-dynasty-phil-robertson-equates-homosexuality-bestiality-article-1.1551556

paula deen and her lost empire . . . is laughing


Not sure exactly the point you are attempting to make here, but I fail to see anything un-classy about the following…

"?It seems like, to me, a vagina?as a man?would be more desirable than a man?s anus. That?s just me. I?m just thinking: There?s more there! She?s got more to offer. I mean, come on, dudes! You know what I?m saying? But hey, sin: It?s not logical, my man. It?s just not logical.?

Also I fail to see anything that is "equating homosexuality with bestiality" as the headline erroneously states or anything that is an "anti gay tirade" as Yahoo describe this.




what part of saying that homosexuality is equal to sex with animals and terrorism, and that black people were happier before the civil rights movement . . . do you find "classy?"
walkonby wrote:
RatBastard wrote:
walkonby wrote:
stay classy duck dynasty

http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/tv-movies/duck-dynasty-phil-robertson-equates-homosexuality-bestiality-article-1.1551556

paula deen and her lost empire . . . is laughing


Not sure exactly the point you are attempting to make here, but I fail to see anything un-classy about the following…

"?It seems like, to me, a vagina?as a man?would be more desirable than a man?s anus. That?s just me. I?m just thinking: There?s more there! She?s got more to offer. I mean, come on, dudes! You know what I?m saying? But hey, sin: It?s not logical, my man. It?s just not logical.?

Also I fail to see anything that is "equating homosexuality with bestiality" as the headline erroneously states or anything that is an "anti gay tirade" as Yahoo describe this.




what part of saying that homosexuality is equal to sex with animals and terrorism, and that black people were happier before the civil rights movement . . . do you find "classy?"


I don't see anything in the interview worthy of him getting fired from his job.  And your comment isn't what he said.
bashing gay people is a done deal in this country.  people dont say the n word in front of black people, because they will get killed.  straight people are soon going to learn . . . we have had enough.
walkonby wrote:
bashing gay people is a done deal in this country.  people dont say the n word in front of black people, because they will get killed.  straight people are soon going to learn . . . we have had enough.


He wasn't bashing gay people and he is entitled to his opinion. It wasn't on the show so who cares?  We have the Landover NFL teams name which is highly offensive and no one cares.  ANd why can't you say the "N" word in front of black people they do it themselves and they rap it in their "songs". 
he does look . . . likes hes the man on the mountain, about to fall down drunk.
I can't believe you're offended by a Duck Dynasty character, walky.
you know . . . somebody told me that they know for a fact that the show is scripted and fake, and the people on there were nothing like that, less than three to five years ago.  they told me it was the greatest pr move that aande and duckdynasty have ever come up with.  looking at it from that angle, good god.  now i dont care.  i shouldnt have cared in the first place . . . but gay issues make me mental crazy, like a cat on catnip eating its way through the bag of dry food.
Elderly hunting enthusiasts from the Deep South have out-of-date views on homosexuality and race relations? Someone stop the presses, no one saw this coming!

I mean, I'm not condoning what the guy said at all (although it probably only rises to the level of "ignorant" and not full-blown "hateful") but is this really surprising? I have never even seen this show and I could've told you the cast would probably have some out-of-touch worldviews on social issues.
The Robertsons made it clear that Duck Dynasty would only continue if Phil is in it because ?we cannot imagine the show going forward without our patriarch at the helm.?

I can't imagine that the network won't cave at this point.  They will just move it to another network.  This has to be the stupidest thing ever.  You should be able to say things off camera that you want.  Freedom of speech.
I'm pretty sure "Duck Dynasty" is owned by A&E and the cast has non-competes for the duration. They can't just move it to another network. (At least not with the same name.)

Although yes, they will clearly let him back in circa 2 weeks as long as he keeps his mouth shut.
you know  . . . i think ill watch an episode tonight just to see what it is all about.  oh my god, this pr move they made, is good.  real good.
walkonby wrote:
RatBastard wrote:
walkonby wrote:
stay classy duck dynasty

http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/tv-movies/duck-dynasty-phil-robertson-equates-homosexuality-bestiality-article-1.1551556

paula deen and her lost empire . . . is laughing


Not sure exactly the point you are attempting to make here, but I fail to see anything un-classy about the following…

"?It seems like, to me, a vagina?as a man?would be more desirable than a man?s anus. That?s just me. I?m just thinking: There?s more there! She?s got more to offer. I mean, come on, dudes! You know what I?m saying? But hey, sin: It?s not logical, my man. It?s just not logical.?

Also I fail to see anything that is "equating homosexuality with bestiality" as the headline erroneously states or anything that is an "anti gay tirade" as Yahoo describe this.




what part of saying that homosexuality is equal to sex with animals and terrorism, and that black people were happier before the civil rights movement . . . do you find "classy?"


I did not read hat he said that anywhere.  I posted the quote directly from the article.  The only thing I ever saw that hinted about animals was the headline that yahoo created in a sad attempt to sensationalize things.  If he actually said that I missed it.
atomic wrote:
walkonby wrote:
RatBastard wrote:
walkonby wrote:
stay classy duck dynasty

http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/tv-movies/duck-dynasty-phil-robertson-equates-homosexuality-bestiality-article-1.1551556

paula deen and her lost empire . . . is laughing


Not sure exactly the point you are attempting to make here, but I fail to see anything un-classy about the following…

"?It seems like, to me, a vagina?as a man?would be more desirable than a man?s anus. That?s just me. I?m just thinking: There?s more there! She?s got more to offer. I mean, come on, dudes! You know what I?m saying? But hey, sin: It?s not logical, my man. It?s just not logical.?

Also I fail to see anything that is "equating homosexuality with bestiality" as the headline erroneously states or anything that is an "anti gay tirade" as Yahoo describe this.




what part of saying that homosexuality is equal to sex with animals and terrorism, and that black people were happier before the civil rights movement . . . do you find "classy?"


I don't see anything in the interview worthy of him getting fired from his job.  And your comment isn't what he said.


My quote came directly form the article listed in the original post and was listed there as a direct quote of the interview by the interviewee.