gaaaaaaaaah
Joined: September 14, 2006 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 1084
Re: The Nats Thread
April 09, 2014 at 06:17 PM UTC
#
laroche has a mutual option for next year
i think it goes without saying that he wont be back
itll be a shame if he keeps hitting like this all year, but its clear where zim is headed
vansmack
Joined: October 04, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 19725
Re: The Nats Thread
April 09, 2014 at 06:21 PM UTC
#
DeathFromAbove1979 wrote:
http://espn.go.com/mlb/story/_/id/10748667/ryan-zimmerman-washington-nationals-play-some-first-base-due-arthritic-shoulder
It got real bad last year.
I'm not buying the arthritis. His offensive numbers have been fairly consistent, which would be hard to do with a roughed up shoulder. And he's still gloving above average - I read yesterday that he made something like 21 errors last season, which wasn't too high for a third baseman - especially one with above average range, but the problem was that the majority of his errors were throwing errors on routine plays.
stevewizzle wrote:
yeah nice to see adam showed up this year in april instead of his typical late-May emergence.
Must be a contact year…
chaz wrote:
Have you read The Art of Fielding?
I have not, but will add it to my list. Thanks!
sweetcell
Joined: July 18, 2006 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 22608
Re: The Nats Thread
April 09, 2014 at 06:39 PM UTC
#
jrpa
Joined: September 03, 2013 at 03:15 PM UTC
Posts: 29999
Re: The Nats Thread
April 09, 2014 at 07:06 PM UTC
#
chaz wrote:
vansmack wrote:
stevewizzle wrote:
agree completely. zimm is done at third. i'm perplexed at his issues… high school third basemen have less issues in the field than he's having.
Focal Dystonia.
Haven't seen a case this bad since Knoblauch (not counting Ankiel because he was a pitcher).
Have you read The Art of Fielding? Although I thought it borrowed too heavily from A Prayer for Owen Meany, it's a good read in which the protagonist, a college shortstop poised for the majors, deals with a nasty case of this.
I love this book for the first three quarters of it. I thought the ending was absolutely bizarre, albeit I'm referring not so much the actual baseball plot, but the bizarre grave-robbery b-story. I do still highly recommended however.
Full disclosure: I am an associate of the author.
HoyaSaxa03
Joined: March 22, 2004 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 7053
Re: The Nats Thread
April 10, 2014 at 05:42 AM UTC
#
Rendon is the truth. Zimm is completely done at 3B.
This much is obvious, but when people talk about this I feel like they gloss over how much Zimm has meant to this franchise. Given his past exploits and hitting potential over the next 5 years, Zimm is underpaid at 11/$135MM, and the Nats need to clear room for him at 1B.
LaRoche has become a veteran leader, but Werth and Zimm will fill that void. Wait until LaRoche's trade value is the highest and deal him.
DeathFromAbove1979
Joined: November 29, 2006 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 5038
Re: The Nats Thread
April 11, 2014 at 05:45 PM UTC
#
It's all about the beards.
Ha ha, the Marlins. It was cute. Looks like another year of punishment for them. Sweeping the lowly Mets and Fish? Losing 2 of 3 to the Barves? Hopefully not a preview of what I feared, pummeling crap teams, losing to good teams.
Just a couple series in and 2 sweeps is great regardless of teams.
vansmack
Joined: October 04, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 19725
Re: The Nats Thread
April 13, 2014 at 03:35 AM UTC
#
Heard Zim broke his thumb. Out 4-6 weeks. Bummer.
But he does have time to think about his throws.
DeathFromAbove1979
Joined: November 29, 2006 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 5038
Re: The Nats Thread
April 14, 2014 at 01:52 PM UTC
#
Not really mad at Rendon getting [probably] every day at 3rd. I am looking forward to Nats letting their frustrations out on the Marlins over this series. Big one heading into the series against the Cards and Angels. We looked down right comedic out there yesterday against the Barves. I had to turn it off…. to watch the Caps get shut out in their finale. smh.
At least we have the Wizards?
vansmack
Joined: October 04, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 19725
Re: The Nats Thread
April 14, 2014 at 04:32 PM UTC
#
DeathFromAbove1979 wrote:
Big one heading into the series against the Cards and Angels.
I appreciate you putting Anaheim in the same conversation as the Cards, but the Angels are barely a .500 team and we really won't know much about the true grit of this team until after this three game set against Oakland.
You all should buy tickets to the Anaheim series however, just to see Mike Trout play. Some O's fans ignored me last year and all he did was make that catch in front of the Southwest Airlines sign that I'm sure you've all seen.
DeathFromAbove1979
Joined: November 29, 2006 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 5038
Re: The Nats Thread
April 14, 2014 at 06:22 PM UTC
#
I meant more so because the Marlins are terrible and it's big heading into non NL East series'. I hate every team in our division. So much.
emmanuel
Joined: August 23, 2013 at 05:33 PM UTC
Posts: 292
Re: The Nats Thread
April 14, 2014 at 06:28 PM UTC
#
GIVE US BACK the EXPOS.
I am still sad :'(
vansmack
Joined: October 04, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 19725
Re: The Nats Thread
April 14, 2014 at 06:40 PM UTC
#
emmanuel wrote:
GIVE US BACK the EXPOS.
I am still sad :'(
I think you should take the A's or the Rays. I'd prefer it be the Rays, mind you, but the A's deserve better than what they've been getting too.
James Ford
Joined: July 22, 2009 at 09:02 PM UTC
Posts: 5620
Re: The Nats Thread
April 14, 2014 at 08:07 PM UTC
#
If it makes you feel better, this is a pet peeve of mine as well. It's funny that people who probably make regular dough sometimes act as if they are part of a sports team whose members make millions of dollars for playing a childs game.
Hexenjagd wrote:
DeathFromAbove1979 wrote:We looked down right comedic out there yesterday against the Barves.
Oh cool, I didn't realize you were a professional baseball player! I learn something new everyday!
(joke by the way, if you could not tell. I just find it funny when fans speak like they are part of the team)
But a related question, do you sports fans also refer to bands in a similar manner? As in, "I went to see the Arcade Fire last night and we really rocked the house!"
DeathFromAbove1979
Joined: November 29, 2006 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 5038
Re: The Nats Thread
April 14, 2014 at 08:10 PM UTC
#
Hexenjagd wrote:
DeathFromAbove1979 wrote:We looked down right comedic out there yesterday against the Barves.
Oh cool, I didn't realize you were a professional baseball player! I learn something new everyday!
(joke by the way, if you could not tell. I just find it funny when fans speak like they are part of the team)
But a related question, do you sports fans also refer to bands in a similar manner? As in, "I went to see the Arcade Fire last night and we really rocked the house!"
Yes.
jrpa
Joined: September 03, 2013 at 03:15 PM UTC
Posts: 29999
Re: The Nats Thread
April 14, 2014 at 08:10 PM UTC
#
This is something of a pet peeve of mine as well, although I do catch myself doing it from time to time. Side question: does it feel more acceptable to you guys if someone does it about a college team and they're an alumni of that college? I love my Red Wings and my Wolverines, but it feels less cringe worthy if I referred to a Michigan team as we as opposed to the Red Wings or The Tigers. Thoughts?
James Ford
Joined: July 22, 2009 at 09:02 PM UTC
Posts: 5620
Re: The Nats Thread
April 14, 2014 at 08:14 PM UTC
#
I graduated from college 24 years ago, I stopped referring to anything pertaining to the college as "we" when I graduated.
Julian, wrote:
This is something of a pet peeve of mine as well, although I do catch myself doing it from time to time. Side question: does it feel more acceptable to you guys if someone does it about a college team and they're an alumni of that college? I love my Red Wings and my Wolverines, but it feels less cringe worthy if I referred to a Michigan team as we as opposed to the Red Wings or The Tigers. Thoughts?
DeathFromAbove1979
Joined: November 29, 2006 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 5038
Re: The Nats Thread
April 14, 2014 at 08:44 PM UTC
#
James wrote:
I graduated from college 24 years ago, I stopped referring to anything pertaining to the college as "we" when I graduated.
Julian, wrote:
This is something of a pet peeve of mine as well, although I do catch myself doing it from time to time. Side question: does it feel more acceptable to you guys if someone does it about a college team and they're an alumni of that college? I love my Red Wings and my Wolverines, but it feels less cringe worthy if I referred to a Michigan team as we as opposed to the Red Wings or The Tigers. Thoughts?
Cool
ggw
Joined: December 16, 2001 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 14237
Re: The Nats Thread
April 14, 2014 at 08:50 PM UTC
#
Does SUNY-Fredonia even have sports teams?
James wrote:
I graduated from college 24 years ago, I stopped referring to anything pertaining to the college as "we" when I graduated.
Julian, wrote:
This is something of a pet peeve of mine as well, although I do catch myself doing it from time to time. Side question: does it feel more acceptable to you guys if someone does it about a college team and they're an alumni of that college? I love my Red Wings and my Wolverines, but it feels less cringe worthy if I referred to a Michigan team as we as opposed to the Red Wings or The Tigers. Thoughts?