jrpa
Joined: September 03, 2013 at 03:15 PM UTC
Posts: 29999
Re: The Nats Thread
April 14, 2014 at 08:52 PM UTC
#
ggw wrote:
Does SUNY-Fredonia even have sports teams?
James wrote:
I graduated from college 24 years ago, I stopped referring to anything pertaining to the college as "we" when I graduated.
Julian, wrote:
This is something of a pet peeve of mine as well, although I do catch myself doing it from time to time. Side question: does it feel more acceptable to you guys if someone does it about a college team and they're an alumni of that college? I love my Red Wings and my Wolverines, but it feels less cringe worthy if I referred to a Michigan team as we as opposed to the Red Wings or The Tigers. Thoughts?
They do, actually. They're DIII I think.
James Ford
Joined: July 22, 2009 at 09:02 PM UTC
Posts: 5620
Re: The Nats Thread
April 14, 2014 at 09:11 PM UTC
#
University at Albany.
Apparently they've made the NCAA tourney four of the last nine years.
ggw wrote:
Does SUNY-Fredonia even have sports teams?
James wrote:
I graduated from college 24 years ago, I stopped referring to anything pertaining to the college as "we" when I graduated.
Julian, wrote:
This is something of a pet peeve of mine as well, although I do catch myself doing it from time to time. Side question: does it feel more acceptable to you guys if someone does it about a college team and they're an alumni of that college? I love my Red Wings and my Wolverines, but it feels less cringe worthy if I referred to a Michigan team as we as opposed to the Red Wings or The Tigers. Thoughts?
jrpa
Joined: September 03, 2013 at 03:15 PM UTC
Posts: 29999
Re: The Nats Thread
April 14, 2014 at 09:16 PM UTC
#
James wrote:
University at Albany.
Apparently they've made the NCAA tourney four of the last nine years.
ggw wrote:
Does SUNY-Fredonia even have sports teams?
James wrote:
I graduated from college 24 years ago, I stopped referring to anything pertaining to the college as "we" when I graduated.
Julian, wrote:
This is something of a pet peeve of mine as well, although I do catch myself doing it from time to time. Side question: does it feel more acceptable to you guys if someone does it about a college team and they're an alumni of that college? I love my Red Wings and my Wolverines, but it feels less cringe worthy if I referred to a Michigan team as we as opposed to the Red Wings or The Tigers. Thoughts?
Their, um, "interesting" jersey design was quite the talk of the first week of the tourney.
vansmack
Joined: October 04, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 19725
Re: The Nats Thread
April 16, 2014 at 03:46 PM UTC
#
vansmack wrote:
You all should buy tickets to the Anaheim series however, just to see Mike Trout play. Some O's fans ignored me last year and all he did was make that catch in front of the Southwest Airlines sign that I'm sure you've all seen.
And don't be LA Fashionably Late either….
2.110 - That's Mike Trout's OPS in the first inning this season. He's 7-for-13, with four homers. There are rival evaluators who say that they will make a point to see all of his plate appearances in every game because they fret about what they might miss.
DeathFromAbove1979
Joined: November 29, 2006 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 5038
Re: The Nats Thread
April 18, 2014 at 01:59 PM UTC
#
Headed to the game tonight. After last nights mess I don't know how excited I am. Even with Gio on the mound. SOMEONE needs to be the stopper. In 2012 is was Stras, in 2013 it was no one. Seeing the defense struggle is just amazingly frustrating. Not to mention the offense going quietly inning after inning.
Really don't want this to be a repeat of last year…. Kept saying "It's early, there's time" and then we got into June/July/August….. Uy. Still…. Very early.
vansmack
Joined: October 04, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 19725
Re: The Nats Thread
April 18, 2014 at 05:45 PM UTC
#
You can't win the division in April, but you can lose it (ask any Anaheim fan about the last two April's). And the Nats are no where near losing it right now.
They have to play better defense though. Last night was comedic, but despite 4 errors, 6 of the 8 runs were still earned. That's a problem you can't solely blame on defense.
stevewizzle
Joined: Unknown
Posts: 0
Re: The Nats Thread
April 18, 2014 at 05:55 PM UTC
#
yeah, and you're seeing wacha vs. gio… on a friday night.
a 9-7 nats team who flops in one game against one of the leagues best in april really doesn't mean anything.
DeathFromAbove1979
Joined: November 29, 2006 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 5038
Re: The Nats Thread
April 18, 2014 at 07:43 PM UTC
#
It just gives me awful flashbacks to last year when all we heard was "it's early, it's a long season" and then we're chasing the Barves all season. I'm not in full on panic mode, but they are frustrating to watch. Lost 5 of the last 7.
Hopefully they can brush that all off with the thick of the pitching rotation coming up this weekend.
James Ford
Joined: July 22, 2009 at 09:02 PM UTC
Posts: 5620
Re: The Nats Thread
April 18, 2014 at 07:47 PM UTC
#
So what position do you play, pitcher or catcher?
DeathFromAbove1979 wrote:
It just gives me awful flashbacks to last year when all we heard was "it's early, it's a long season" and then we're chasing the Barves all season. I'm not in full on panic mode, but they are frustrating to watch. Lost 5 of the last 7.
Hopefully they can brush that all off with the thick of the pitching rotation coming up this weekend.
hutch
Joined: Unknown
Posts: 0
Re: The Nats Thread
April 21, 2014 at 11:53 AM UTC
#
'I sat with him for a couple of minutes in his locker and told him I'm confident in him and I'm proud of him and he was going to have impact today, which he did,'' Williams said.
Harper had a somewhat different take on the conversation with Williams, as far as length goes.
''He just said, 'Go get 'em.' That's the three words he said,'' Harper said. ''It's good to get back out there and play and be part of a win.''
gaaaaaaaaah
Joined: September 14, 2006 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 1084
Re: The Nats Thread
April 21, 2014 at 12:57 PM UTC
#
not sure how i feel about the harper benching
on one hand, it certainly sends a strong message (and one davey would never have sent) to never give up. as frustrating as the nats have been at times this season, theyve shown far more drive to come from behind whereas last year theyd fold the second they fall behind. of course itd be nice if the team wrent always in the position to need to come back by the second inning, but thats another issue.
on the other hand, i know harper had had some slight leg issues this week so i have a hard time faulting him for not going 110% on a soft grounder to the pitcher. anything can happen at any time sure, but if ever there was a play to save some energy, thats the one. the guy cant win: he plays too hard and hurts himself and he gets ripped apart by the media, he takes it easy from time to time and he gets ripped apart by his coaches.
im not gonna jump on the bryce is a diva train (anyone read boswell's scathing piece this weekend? ouch) but i do think there are times he needs reminded that hes a good player who hasnt yet become a great one. not sure if this was the right way to go about that, but i like that williams is willing to make a statement like that
now if the pitching staff could wake up and take some pressure off the bats, theyd be in good shape, even with all the errors.
DeathFromAbove1979
Joined: November 29, 2006 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 5038
Re: The Nats Thread
April 21, 2014 at 02:21 PM UTC
#
Up and down series against the Cards. At least the 2nd loss wasn't horrific.
I feel like Williams has gone through such a crazy season and he's only 20 or so games in hahaha
kmdobrz
Joined: February 10, 2000 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 3373
Re: The Nats Thread
April 21, 2014 at 03:03 PM UTC
#
vansmack wrote:
You all should buy tickets to the Anaheim series however, just to see Mike Trout play. Some O's fans ignored me last year and all he did was make that catch in front of the Southwest Airlines sign that I'm sure you've all seen.
Guilty. I was in the upper level walking to my seat. Caught it on the monitor.
vansmack
Joined: October 04, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 19725
Re: The Nats Thread
April 21, 2014 at 04:37 PM UTC
#
I like the way Anaheim is going to match up with the Nats this week.
Richards has been the Angels most consistent starter (finally) and could be a star in the making.
I also like Skaggs in the battle of the youngsters over Jordan.
I think Gio beats Weaver. He's lost his command and you can't win throwing 85 mph if you don't hit your target.
Of course, when the Angels bullpen has to come in the game, all bets are off.
So I'll take the Angels in the first 7 innings of 2 out of 3 this week.
stevewizzle
Joined: Unknown
Posts: 0
Re: The Nats Thread
April 21, 2014 at 04:42 PM UTC
#
does richards really have that potential?
i picked him up last week in my keeper league.
vansmack
Joined: October 04, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 19725
Re: The Nats Thread
April 21, 2014 at 05:08 PM UTC
#
stevewizzle wrote:
does richards really have that potential?
i picked him up last week in my keeper league.
Yes. When they asked all the Angels pitchers who had the nastiest stuff, it was unanimous: Garrett Richards.
He's had command issues, but part of that was the Angels doing. They kept moving him around from starter to the pen, but finally decided last August that it was time to keep him in the rotation for good.
He had a great spring, has given up one extra base hit all season and that led to one bad inning against Oakland. I've been very impressed at what he's done since they've decided to keep him in the rotation.
vansmack
Joined: October 04, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 19725
Re: The Nats Thread
April 21, 2014 at 05:39 PM UTC
#
gaaaaaaaaah wrote:
not sure how i feel about the harper benching
"Andrew McCutchen was benched once for a similar transgression. He went to Clint Hurdle and acknowledged that he blew it, took his punishment and moved on and speaks openly to this day about how he made a mistake."
vansmack
Joined: October 04, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 19725
Re: The Nats Thread
April 21, 2014 at 08:49 PM UTC
#
hutch wrote:
do you see Bryce doing that?
He had his chance,
and didn't.