Space Freely
Joined: December 13, 2014 at 07:28 PM UTC
Posts: 11019
Re: The Nats Thread
September 06, 2017 at 08:25 PM UTC
#
vansmack wrote:
Space wrote:
Harper has gone all Negro on us.
How can you be sure he didn't go all white college girl on spring break?
Clownrows, bro. I bet his wife is already counting the days until he's a Yankee.
Space Freely
Joined: December 13, 2014 at 07:28 PM UTC
Posts: 11019
Re: The Nats Thread
September 09, 2017 at 04:02 AM UTC
#
My first game of the year and what a fucking game by Michael A.
hutch
Joined: Unknown
Posts: 0
Re: The Nats Thread
September 09, 2017 at 04:16 AM UTC
#
Haha u saw an inside the park grand slam!!
Space Freely
Joined: December 13, 2014 at 07:28 PM UTC
Posts: 11019
Re: The Nats Thread
September 09, 2017 at 01:32 PM UTC
#
hutch wrote:
Haha u saw an inside the park grand slam!!
Only the second one in 18 years!
martinrob
Joined: December 20, 2006 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 126
Re: The Nats Thread
September 10, 2017 at 11:02 PM UTC
#
Nat's wrapped up the East today. It is going to be a interesting series next weekend with the Dodgers. Saturday seems like the best matchup with Strasburg and Hill.
DeathFromAbove1979
Joined: November 29, 2006 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 5038
Re: The Nats Thread
September 11, 2017 at 07:13 PM UTC
#
Nats have won the division as many times as the Mets have in 44 years
That is pretty funny
challenged
Joined: September 25, 2003 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 3116
Re: The Nats Thread
September 12, 2017 at 12:43 AM UTC
#
DeathFromAbove1979 wrote:
Nats have won the division as many times as the Mets have in 44 years
That is pretty funny
Funny/Sad either way. Nats have to get out of the first round.
Still, am I missing the single game onsale for playoff tixkets, or has it already happened?
DeathFromAbove1979
Joined: November 29, 2006 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 5038
Re: The Nats Thread
September 13, 2017 at 06:02 PM UTC
#
Don't think it has happened yet seeing as they're the first team to clinch so maybe the schedules aren't set yet. Maybe I missed it as well though.
vansmack
Joined: October 04, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 19725
Re: The Nats Thread
September 13, 2017 at 06:17 PM UTC
#
challenged wrote:
DeathFromAbove1979 wrote:
Nats have won the division as many times as the Mets have in 44 years
That is pretty funny
Funny/Sad either way. Nats have to get out of the first round.
Yes, dig it - you're the A's of the twenty-teens!
Speaking of which - whose going to call Cleveland and tell them that when the A's won 20 straight they were bounced in the first round?
Space Freely
Joined: December 13, 2014 at 07:28 PM UTC
Posts: 11019
Re: The Nats Thread
October 10, 2017 at 12:30 AM UTC
#
Two reasons why the Cubs won:
1. Dusty
2. Baker
hutch
Joined: Unknown
Posts: 0
Re: The Nats Thread
October 10, 2017 at 02:03 AM UTC
#
I like Dusty
Werth sucks and was to blame on bloop single. Not sure it is Dusty Baker's fault Nats got three hits…
Space Freely
Joined: December 13, 2014 at 07:28 PM UTC
Posts: 11019
Re: The Nats Thread
October 10, 2017 at 01:27 PM UTC
#
hutch wrote:
I like Dusty
Werth sucks and was to blame on bloop single. Not sure it is Dusty Baker's fault Nats got three hits…
They lost because the dumbass manager pulled the best pitcher in baseball after 6+ innings of shutout ball and only 98 pitches thrown, the first 97 of which were not for base hits. And with several stellar options in the bullpen, none of which he should have gone with at that point anyway, the dumbass manager made the decision to replace the best pitcher in baseball with a guy who had a season WHIP of 1.436 and ERA of 5.88.
StoneTheCrow
Joined: January 05, 2006 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 2297
Re: The Nats Thread
October 10, 2017 at 01:47 PM UTC
#
Not a Nats fan but have to agree. There's no way he should have pulled Max there.
And nobody diving for that bloop single was kinda dumb, too.
kmdobrz
Joined: February 10, 2000 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 3373
Re: The Nats Thread
October 10, 2017 at 03:28 PM UTC
#
Hello, Joe Girardi
DeathFromAbove1979
Joined: November 29, 2006 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 5038
Re: The Nats Thread
October 10, 2017 at 03:33 PM UTC
#
I think pulling Max was the right call, but in that spot, looking to go up, when the bats are silent again, Max has shown that he can power through those kinds of situations. I think you let him rock through that inning and check his hamstring after. It's the playoffs. THIS is why you kept him out game 1 and 2. THIS is where you push the players. Now they're facing elimination. ESPECIALLY when the bullpen [yeah, different teams yadda yadda] has blown starts for this team again and again.
Can't win when the bats go silent though.
Space Freely
Joined: December 13, 2014 at 07:28 PM UTC
Posts: 11019
Re: The Nats Thread
October 10, 2017 at 03:46 PM UTC
#
DeathFromAbove1979 wrote:
I think pulling Max was the right call, but in that spot, looking to go up, when the bats are silent again, Max has shown that he can power through those kinds of situations. I think you let him rock through that inning and check his hamstring after. It's the playoffs. THIS is why you kept him out game 1 and 2. THIS is where you push the players. Now they're facing elimination. ESPECIALLY when the bullpen [yeah, different teams yadda yadda] has blown starts for this team again and again.
Can't win when the bats go silent though.
Tell that to the Cubs. They have only eight runs on 15 hits in 26 innings and still managed to win two out of three.
DeathFromAbove1979
Joined: November 29, 2006 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 5038
Re: The Nats Thread
October 10, 2017 at 04:58 PM UTC
#
They've scored more than the Nats? Lol
This has been the Nats boogeyman smh. I *hope* there's a rain delay so Stras can take the hill tomorrow.
Space Freely
Joined: December 13, 2014 at 07:28 PM UTC
Posts: 11019
Re: The Nats Thread
October 10, 2017 at 05:17 PM UTC
#
DeathFromAbove1979 wrote:
They've scored more than the Nats? Lol
This has been the Nats boogeyman smh. I *hope* there's a rain delay so Stras can take the hill tomorrow.
Small sample size but Illinois native Roark has been impressive at Wrigley. And Arrieta has not been that good against the Nats. Still, yeah forecast definitely looks good for a rainout and I'll take Strasburg over Roark on the mound any day. If Strasburg pitched game 4 and they won, who would pitch game 5? Would Gio have enough rest or would you have to go with Roark anyway?
DeathFromAbove1979
Joined: November 29, 2006 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 5038
Re: The Nats Thread
October 10, 2017 at 05:21 PM UTC
#
I guess it depends on the bats. Probably have to go Roark in game 5. Gio seems too up and down and I'm not a huge fan of short rest if it's not needed.
hutch
Joined: Unknown
Posts: 0
Re: The Nats Thread
October 10, 2017 at 05:24 PM UTC
#
Ha..that is why u guys are not managing
Scherzer ummm is coming back from injury…the sports hunkies saidwhen he starts huffing around the mound rizzo said it means he is done…they disagreed 2 to 2 on whether he should have been pinch hit previous AB
werth should have been subbed for defense…
Kendrick should have started all games but they just love them some werth but dusty costing them game??? Umm 1-4 batters 0 for 16 cost game
But i get it..blaming dusty is fans pastime
I prefer maddon and girardi to dusty but dusty is working without long term deal…maddon or just about anybody would not do that…other issue might be bryce batting 2nd