sweetcell
Joined: July 18, 2006 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 22608
Re: The we should really have a YouTube thread thread
November 10, 2014 at 10:45 PM UTC
#
azaghal1981 wrote:
3,537,516 views.
99% of which bailed after less than 2 minutes, i am guessing.
vansmack
Joined: October 04, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 19725
Re: The we should really have a YouTube thread thread
November 11, 2014 at 05:50 PM UTC
#
ggw
Joined: December 16, 2001 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 14237
Re: The we should really have a YouTube thread thread
November 11, 2014 at 08:06 PM UTC
#
sweetcell
Joined: July 18, 2006 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 22608
Re: The we should really have a YouTube thread thread
November 13, 2014 at 04:48 PM UTC
#
ggw wrote:
(Social Experiment)
wait - so, based on this rigorous implementation of the scientific method, we can conclude that there are men willing take advantage of an attractive inebriated woman? wow! i'll send notification to the National Academy of Sciences!!!
that is some edgy social commentary right there…
ggw
Joined: December 16, 2001 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 14237
Re: The we should really have a YouTube thread thread
November 13, 2014 at 05:25 PM UTC
#
sweetcell wrote:
ggw wrote:
(Social Experiment)
wait - so, based on this rigorous implementation of the scientific method, we can conclude that there are men willing take advantage of an attractive inebriated woman? wow! i'll send notification to the National Academy of Sciences!!!
that is some edgy social commentary right there…
I believe it was mostly a play on the Hollaback "social experiment" which got so much attention:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b1XGPvbWn0A
jrpa
Joined: September 03, 2013 at 03:15 PM UTC
Posts: 29999
Re: The we should really have a YouTube thread thread
November 13, 2014 at 05:31 PM UTC
#
re: Hollaback
I want to comment on that on here because I don't remember seeing us discuss it yet. What I find most irksome about this is just the intellectual dishonesty of the entire thing. It says in the ending she got over 100 cases of verbal abuse from "people of all backgrounds."
Horseshit. Pure, unadulterated horseshit. She was not harassed by people of all backgrounds; she was harassed by poorly educated, lowest-quintile minority males. College professors were not whistling at her. White men with Master's Degrees were not yelling "bless you, mami!" No captain of industry stuck his head out of his limousine as it passed by and yelled "hey toots, nice cans!"
This is not a "men are pigs" issue. It's a "3% of men – who all come from the exact same 'hood' background – are pigs issue." But hey, don't let facts get in the way of your insane narrative.
ggw
Joined: December 16, 2001 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 14237
Re: The we should really have a YouTube thread thread
November 13, 2014 at 05:47 PM UTC
#
Julian, wrote:
re: Hollaback
I want to comment on that on here because I don't remember seeing us discuss it yet. What I find most irksome about this is just the intellectual dishonesty of the entire thing. It says in the ending she got over 100 cases of verbal abuse from "people of all backgrounds."
Horseshit. Pure, unadulterated horseshit. She was not harassed by people of all backgrounds; she was harassed by poorly educated, lowest-quintile minority males. College professors were not whistling at her. White men with Master's Degrees were not yelling "bless you, mami!" No captain of industry stuck his head out of his limousine as it passed by and yelled "hey toots, nice cans!"
This is not a "men are pigs" issue. It's a "3% of men – who all come from the exact same 'hood' background – are pigs issue." But hey, don't let facts get in the way of your insane narrative.
What I find most irksome about this is that she simply is not attractive. I mean, do men not have standards anymore?
jrpa
Joined: September 03, 2013 at 03:15 PM UTC
Posts: 29999
Re: The we should really have a YouTube thread thread
November 13, 2014 at 05:48 PM UTC
#
ggw wrote:
Julian, wrote:
re: Hollaback
I want to comment on that on here because I don't remember seeing us discuss it yet. What I find most irksome about this is just the intellectual dishonesty of the entire thing. It says in the ending she got over 100 cases of verbal abuse from "people of all backgrounds."
Horseshit. Pure, unadulterated horseshit. She was not harassed by people of all backgrounds; she was harassed by poorly educated, lowest-quintile minority males. College professors were not whistling at her. White men with Master's Degrees were not yelling "bless you, mami!" No captain of industry stuck his head out of his limousine as it passed by and yelled "hey toots, nice cans!"
This is not a "men are pigs" issue. It's a "3% of men – who all come from the exact same 'hood' background – are pigs issue." But hey, don't let facts get in the way of your insane narrative.
What I find most irksome about this is that she simply is not attractive. I mean, do men not have standards anymore?
Well played.
ggw
Joined: December 16, 2001 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 14237
Re: The we should really have a YouTube thread thread
November 13, 2014 at 05:52 PM UTC
#
Julian, wrote:
ggw wrote:
Julian, wrote:
re: Hollaback
I want to comment on that on here because I don't remember seeing us discuss it yet. What I find most irksome about this is just the intellectual dishonesty of the entire thing. It says in the ending she got over 100 cases of verbal abuse from "people of all backgrounds."
Horseshit. Pure, unadulterated horseshit. She was not harassed by people of all backgrounds; she was harassed by poorly educated, lowest-quintile minority males. College professors were not whistling at her. White men with Master's Degrees were not yelling "bless you, mami!" No captain of industry stuck his head out of his limousine as it passed by and yelled "hey toots, nice cans!"
This is not a "men are pigs" issue. It's a "3% of men – who all come from the exact same 'hood' background – are pigs issue." But hey, don't let facts get in the way of your insane narrative.
What I find most irksome about this is that she simply is not attractive. I mean, do men not have standards anymore?
Well played.
btw - You forgot to log in as James Ford before you posted your initial rant.
jrpa
Joined: September 03, 2013 at 03:15 PM UTC
Posts: 29999
Re: The we should really have a YouTube thread thread
November 13, 2014 at 05:53 PM UTC
#
The wealthy and well-educated are better than the poor is a dyed-in-the-wool Julian issue. I didn't bring up religion.
ggw
Joined: December 16, 2001 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 14237
Re: The we should really have a YouTube thread thread
December 10, 2014 at 08:07 PM UTC
#
RatBastard
Joined: January 07, 2003 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 2955
Re: The we should really have a YouTube thread thread
December 17, 2014 at 10:44 PM UTC
#
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RP5zZaYNF6g(Warning there are no outback coupons displayed in this video.)
RatBastard
Joined: January 07, 2003 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 2955
Re: The we should really have a YouTube thread thread
December 31, 2014 at 04:25 PM UTC
#
vansmack
Joined: October 04, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 19725
Re: The we should really have a YouTube thread thread
January 13, 2015 at 01:22 AM UTC
#
Some dude just found an unreleased Beastie Boys Video for Too Many Rappers (featuring NAS)
http://musicvideos.sweetcutz.com/video/48932590Sometimes sweet joy for things once thought lost.
Backstory
sweetcell
Joined: July 18, 2006 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 22608
Re: The we should really have a YouTube thread thread
January 13, 2015 at 05:50 PM UTC
#
vansmack wrote:
Some dude just found an unreleased Beastie Boys Video for Too Many Rappers (featuring NAS)
http://musicvideos.sweetcutz.com/video/48932590
Sometimes sweet joy for things once thought lost.
Backstory
video has been taken down. booooooooooooooooooooooo.
edit: now available here
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=llCvXypv-kU, watch it while you can:
sweetcell
Joined: July 18, 2006 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 22608
Re: The we should really have a YouTube thread thread
January 14, 2015 at 03:28 PM UTC
#
walkonby wrote:
guurrl
walkonby wrote:
Gurrl.
etc.
=
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yUtMQpg5MVg