atomic
Joined: August 27, 2013 at 01:49 PM UTC
Posts: 2093
Re: Those Darned Redskins, Pt. Deux
December 09, 2013 at 09:59 PM UTC
#
James wrote:
While I would think at least 50% of the population (plus, additionally only me, apparently), would find use of the word cun* offensive, I'm betting most of them wouldn't find use of the word "darned" offensive. But I've been wrong on numerous occasions in my life.
Or, if you're referring to the word "redskins", I think you have to think about context. A guy insulting a guy by referring to him as a female body part is more derogatory than referring to a team as "redskins", imo.
atomic wrote:
I find it funny that James Ford is all upset about a word being used in a thread whose very title is more offensive and he hasn't complained about that yet. Come on the NFL Landover team is super offensive. Lets change that first and maybe the bad karma will go away.
You think that more people being offended by the one you are offended by is that there are a ton of women in the country and we have done a good job of removing native Americans from anywhere around us? I would state that probably around 50 percent of VA, MD and DC is made up of woman. How many Native Americans are left in this area?
i am gay and i like cats
Joined: Unknown
Posts: 0
Re: Those Darned Redskins, Pt. Deux
December 09, 2013 at 10:03 PM UTC
#
jesus christ . . . james ford, really is, a cunt.
vansmack
Joined: October 04, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 19725
Re: Those Darned Redskins, Pt. Deux
December 09, 2013 at 10:06 PM UTC
#
atomic wrote:
sweetcell wrote:
but i'm pretty sure there are more first-rounders who have become franchise QBs, than late rounders (Brady is the obvious exception, but for every low-round star you point out i'll name you 3 first rounders).
Really what quarterback not named Manning has been drafted in the top 10 picks and has made it even to the super bowl recently
Ones that are not top 10 picks.
In typical fashion, you altered the argument to suit your needs. Sweetcell said first round, you then narrowed it down top 10, and then listed Super Bowl QB's and not "franchise" QBs.
Making a Super Bowl does not make you a franchise QB.
Brian_Walalce
Joined: May 16, 2005 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 1484
Re: Those Darned Redskins, Pt. Deux
December 09, 2013 at 10:16 PM UTC
#
vansmack wrote:
Making a Super Bowl does not make you a franchise QB.
…but it does get you paid. On man, do you get PAID.

Brian
James Ford
Joined: July 22, 2009 at 09:02 PM UTC
Posts: 5620
Re: Those Darned Redskins, Pt. Deux
December 09, 2013 at 10:20 PM UTC
#
Who asked you, faggot? :P
walkonby wrote:
jesus christ . . . james ford, really is, a cunt.
Yada
Joined: February 05, 2003 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 12418
Re: Those Darned Redskins, Pt. Deux
December 09, 2013 at 10:45 PM UTC
#
James wrote:
Who asked you, faggot? :P
walkonby wrote:
jesus christ . . . james ford, really is, a cunt.
Smiley face isults still hurt feelings.
vansmack
Joined: October 04, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 19725
Re: Those Darned Redskins, Pt. Deux
December 09, 2013 at 10:46 PM UTC
#
Evil Santa must be on vacation or something….
i am gay and i like cats
Joined: Unknown
Posts: 0
Re: Those Darned Redskins, Pt. Deux
December 09, 2013 at 10:47 PM UTC
#
stop calling me a bundle of sticks.
stevewizzle
Joined: Unknown
Posts: 0
Re: Those Darned Redskins, Pt. Deux
December 09, 2013 at 11:01 PM UTC
#
gotta love that moment on this forum where the conversation gets lost by pages of james ford and atomic battling about who is the bigger doodoohead.
atomic
Joined: August 27, 2013 at 01:49 PM UTC
Posts: 2093
Re: Those Darned Redskins, Pt. Deux
December 09, 2013 at 11:13 PM UTC
#
vansmack wrote:
atomic wrote:
sweetcell wrote:
but i'm pretty sure there are more first-rounders who have become franchise QBs, than late rounders (Brady is the obvious exception, but for every low-round star you point out i'll name you 3 first rounders).
Really what quarterback not named Manning has been drafted in the top 10 picks and has made it even to the super bowl recently
Ones that are not top 10 picks.
In typical fashion, you altered the argument to suit your needs. Sweetcell said first round, you then narrowed it down top 10, and then listed Super Bowl QB's and not "franchise" QBs.
Making a Super Bowl does not make you a franchise QB.
How else can you logically state the Quaterback is worth taking? WTF does "Franchise Quarterback mean"? The best quarterbacks get you to the super bowl during their career. Any other method of measure is bullshit because getting to the super bowl is the goal. I don't think it is any teams plans to disappoint the fans year after year with their QB pick..
I was using the top 10 as the landover Nfl team already had a top 10 pick and they didn't need to trade up. I said it was a terrible move at the time to trade up. If you have 3 top 10 picks odds are you going to get at least 2 all pro type players. Well at least that is how it has been for the Ravens.
kosmo
Joined: September 23, 1999 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 16329
Re: Those Darned Redskins, Pt. Deux
December 09, 2013 at 11:33 PM UTC
#
no evil santa doesn't usually read sports threads and he and I both agree the C word is on the to be avoid list…
atomic
Joined: August 27, 2013 at 01:49 PM UTC
Posts: 2093
Re: Those Darned Redskins, Pt. Deux
December 10, 2013 at 01:54 PM UTC
#
stevewizzle wrote:
gotta love that moment on this forum where the conversation gets lost by pages of james ford and atomic battling about who is the bigger doodoohead.
Actually once again you are clueless. James Ford is not arguing about me at all. I haven't used any offensive words. Not the Landover football team name, not the "N" word, not the "C" word….. The shitty Vermont beer you have been drinking has destroy your brain cells evidently.
i am gay and i like cats
Joined: Unknown
Posts: 0
Re: Those Darned Redskins, Pt. Deux
December 10, 2013 at 06:09 PM UTC
#
im a little upset . . . that i was not referred to as a, doodoohead.
atomic
Joined: August 27, 2013 at 01:49 PM UTC
Posts: 2093
Re: Those Darned Redskins, Pt. Deux
December 10, 2013 at 06:59 PM UTC
#
walkonby wrote:
im a little upset . . . that i was not referred to as a, doodoohead.
James Ford and WalkOnBy were the doodooheads.
DeathFromAbove1979
Joined: November 29, 2006 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 5038
Re: Those Darned Redskins, Pt. Deux
December 11, 2013 at 03:37 PM UTC
#
hutch wrote:
wow I hadn't thought of this angle…"firing with cause"
http://sports.yahoo.com/news/redskins-contemplating-firing-mike-shanahan-203700134–nfl.html
Mike Shannahan deserves to be fired. But first he's going to make a spectacle of this and make himself look like a victim. This guy is a cerifiable turd.
And now he's benched RG3 because he's worried he'll get injured. This guy is maddening.
atomic
Joined: August 27, 2013 at 01:49 PM UTC
Posts: 2093
Re: Those Darned Redskins, Pt. Deux
December 11, 2013 at 03:39 PM UTC
#
DeathFromAbove1979 wrote:
hutch wrote:
wow I hadn't thought of this angle…"firing with cause"
http://sports.yahoo.com/news/redskins-contemplating-firing-mike-shanahan-203700134–nfl.html
Mike Shannahan deserves to be fired. But first he's going to make a spectacle of this and make himself look like a victim. This guy is a cerifiable turd.
And now he's benched RG3 because he's worried he'll get injured. This guy is maddening.
He wants to get fired. It is in his contract that he can make all decisions about who plays. So if the owner gets pissed off and fires him he gets 7 million to sit home and relax. Sounds like a good plan.
Brian_Walalce
Joined: May 16, 2005 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 1484
Re: Those Darned Redskins, Pt. Deux
December 11, 2013 at 05:15 PM UTC
#
I'm shocked no one has speculated on who the next coach is going to be.
IF they still had one or two of those picks they gave to St. Louis to get RG III, I'd think Jimmy Johnson is a possibility. Just so he can screw Jerry Jones. If Al Davis were still alive, he'd trade a fortune to get RG III to Oakland.
Brian