Hutch wrote:YES!!!! That is exactly what we need
Also, is a 76 year old white man the right person to challenge Biden and / or Trump?
The Armageddon Election 2024 Or Apocalypse 2024
Tim Scott has dropped out.
It seems like Jill Stein is more of a risk to Dems than actual Democrats like Joe Manchin or Dean Phillips
Who would actually vote for those guys?
Who would actually vote for those guys?
Side-vermin wrote:
It seems like Jill Stein is more of a risk to Dems than actual Democrats like Joe Manchin or Dean Phillips
Who would actually vote for those guys?
I am throwing my 🎩 in the ring…. If I can peel enough votes in Arlington I can throw Virginia to Trump.
Working on my platform
Side-vermin wrote:
It seems like Jill Stein is more of a risk to Dems than actual Democrats like Joe Manchin or Dean Phillips
Who would actually vote for those guys?
Jill Stein couldn't help Hillary, she isn't going to be able to help herself (even enough to be a spoiler). I think I'd be concerned most about Cornell West.
How does RFK Jr play into it?
Hutch wrote:he really only seems to pull votes from trump
How does RFK Jr play into it?
So we should donate to his campaign?
gavroche wrote:I . . . I don't think she was trying to?
Jill Stein couldn't help Hillary,
Julian, wrote:gavroche wrote:I . . . I don't think she was trying to?
Jill Stein couldn't help Hillary,
Embarssing slip up on my part, I was thinking of Gloria Steinam! I stand by the rest of the statement though.
gavroche wrote:So refreshing that you just admitted it instead of trying to have an argument for five pages defending the idea that Jill Stein was trying to help Hillary like half of this rabble would do. POTW.Julian, wrote:gavroche wrote:I . . . I don't think she was trying to?
Jill Stein couldn't help Hillary,
Embarssing slip up on my part, I was thinking of Gloria Steinam! I stand by the rest of the statement though.
Crestfallen.
The Economist with its rosy predictions
The Economist’s annual “World Ahead” guide identifies Donald Trump as the biggest global danger of 2024.
“n the 38 years that we have published this guide, no single person has ever eclipsed our analysis as much as Donald Trump eclipses 2024.”
https://www.economist.com/leaders/2023/11/16/donald-trump-poses-the-biggest-danger-to-the-world-in-2024
The Economist’s annual “World Ahead” guide identifies Donald Trump as the biggest global danger of 2024.
“n the 38 years that we have published this guide, no single person has ever eclipsed our analysis as much as Donald Trump eclipses 2024.”
https://www.economist.com/leaders/2023/11/16/donald-trump-poses-the-biggest-danger-to-the-world-in-2024
shame to lose such talent ;)
Rep. Dean Phillips (D-Minn.), who is mounting a long-shot Democratic primary challenge to President Biden, said Friday he won't seek reelection to the House in 2024.
Rep. Dean Phillips (D-Minn.), who is mounting a long-shot Democratic primary challenge to President Biden, said Friday he won't seek reelection to the House in 2024.
Side-hatch wrote:
shame to lose such talent ;)
Rep. Dean Phillips (D-Minn.), who is mounting a long-shot Democratic primary challenge to President Biden, said Friday he won't seek reelection to the House in 2024.
At least he's all in for the Presidency!
another sign of the Apocalypse

wapo

wapo
Side-hatch wrote:
another sign of the Apocalypse
wapo
i've been reading a number of articles stating that the US is heading for (if not already in) a dating/marrying/childbearing crisis due to political polarization. specifically, left-leaning women are refusing to date right-leaning men. example meta-article: The Washington Post is very worried that American women don't want to marry Trump supporters.
of the 3 or 4 articles on the topic i've read, the proposed solution is either unknowable or for women to compromise. not a single one posited that these right-wing dudes could find romantic success by abandoning their support for anti-abortion policies, cuts to social spending, increased gun rights, and other regressive policies.
incels going mainstream on the right…
sweetcell wrote:The Washington Post is very worried that American women don't want to marry Trump supporterswell in playing the long game, this tactic will work in 20-25 years as we'll use natural selection to remove them from the population
might be a little longer as we have to wait for all the living not dateable to expire too
sweetcell wrote:Side-hatch wrote:
another sign of the Apocalypse
wapo
i've been reading a number of articles stating that the US is heading for (if not already in) a dating/marrying/childbearing crisis due to political polarization. specifically, left-leaning women are refusing to date right-leaning men. example meta-article: The Washington Post is very worried that American women don't want to marry Trump supporters.
of the 3 or 4 articles on the topic i've read, the proposed solution is either unknowable or for women to compromise. not a single one posited that these right-wing dudes could find romantic success by abandoning their support for anti-abortion policies, cuts to social spending, increased gun rights, and other regressive policies.
incels going mainstream on the right…
I guess that's good news for my to the right of her parents daughter?
yeah, she'll have her pick of all the right-wing douchebags… have at!