vansmack wrote:
D-Backs got Arroyo, only a 2-year deal. That's a coup if true…
UPDATE: 2-yr, $19m, club option for third year.
That's a great deal for AZ.
Orioles offciaially suck. Why didn't they beat that deal?
vansmack wrote:
D-Backs got Arroyo, only a 2-year deal. That's a coup if true…
UPDATE: 2-yr, $19m, club option for third year.
That's a great deal for AZ.
Shemp wrote:
ESPN.com's Jerry Crasnick tweeted the following:
"It was #dbacks vs. #orioles at the end for Bronson Arroyo. He wanted to pitch in NL, which helped give Arizona the edge"
gaaaaaaaaah wrote:
curious to see where burnett goes. kilgore suggested the nats make a play. not sure if i buy it, but it would be an interesting move. he'll probably end up back in pittsburgh, provided they can carve out some budget space
atomic wrote:
Orioles offciaially suck. Why didn't they beat that deal?
Shemp wrote:
Edit: He has an Insider column on it which just posted. Which I can't access.
vansmack wrote:gaaaaaaaaah wrote:
curious to see where burnett goes. kilgore suggested the nats make a play. not sure if i buy it, but it would be an interesting move. he'll probably end up back in pittsburgh, provided they can carve out some budget space
The hot rumor on Pittsburgh is that they already made the best offer months ago, but that he was extremely pissed about being passed up for the rookie in game 5 of the NLDS and won't return.
I don't see him going to the Nats, who really don't need him and should probably focus on the bullpen with that cash.
Shemp wrote:
Garza passed on Angels' offer because he was on vacation.
http://tracking.si.com/2014/02/17/matt-garza-passed-angels-vacation/?xid=nl_siextra
Shemp wrote:
New dress code in St. Louis:
'The following is not permitted under our dress code after 9pm: sleeveless shirts on men, profanity on clothing, exposed undergarments on men, sweat pants, full sweat suits, excessively long shirts (when standing upright with arms at your side, the bottom of your shirt can not extend below the tip of your fingers), jerseys (sleeved jerseys are permitted in conjunction with a cardinals game or any other major St. Louis sporting event), athletic shorts and excessively sagging pants or shorts bandanas.'
http://deadspin.com/new-st-louis-ballpark-village-has-a-ridiculous-dress-c-1552078792
James wrote:
It's odd that they would call what sounds like a perfectly reasonable dress code "ridiculous".Shemp wrote:
New dress code in St. Louis:
'The following is not permitted under our dress code after 9pm: sleeveless shirts on men, profanity on clothing, exposed undergarments on men, sweat pants, full sweat suits, excessively long shirts (when standing upright with arms at your side, the bottom of your shirt can not extend below the tip of your fingers), jerseys (sleeved jerseys are permitted in conjunction with a cardinals game or any other major St. Louis sporting event), athletic shorts and excessively sagging pants or shorts bandanas.'
http://deadspin.com/new-st-louis-ballpark-village-has-a-ridiculous-dress-c-1552078792
stevewizzle wrote:James wrote:
It's odd that they would call what sounds like a perfectly reasonable dress code "ridiculous".Shemp wrote:
New dress code in St. Louis:
'The following is not permitted under our dress code after 9pm: sleeveless shirts on men, profanity on clothing, exposed undergarments on men, sweat pants, full sweat suits, excessively long shirts (when standing upright with arms at your side, the bottom of your shirt can not extend below the tip of your fingers), jerseys (sleeved jerseys are permitted in conjunction with a cardinals game or any other major St. Louis sporting event), athletic shorts and excessively sagging pants or shorts bandanas.'
http://deadspin.com/new-st-louis-ballpark-village-has-a-ridiculous-dress-c-1552078792
this might be the most james ford response ever.
Shemp wrote:
New dress code in St. Louis:
'The following is not permitted under our dress code after 9pm: sleeveless shirts on men, profanity on clothing, exposed undergarments on men, sweat pants, full sweat suits, excessively long shirts (when standing upright with arms at your side, the bottom of your shirt can not extend below the tip of your fingers), jerseys (sleeved jerseys are permitted in conjunction with a cardinals game or any other major St. Louis sporting event), athletic shorts and excessively sagging pants or shorts bandanas.'
http://deadspin.com/new-st-louis-ballpark-village-has-a-ridiculous-dress-c-1552078792
atomic wrote:Why does what people in Baltimore wear matter to you? Why do you want people with long shirts to get beat by the cops? I know you are trolling but this is ridiculous.
I was hopeful that this was for the whole city of St Louis but it is just for a ballpark? Maybe we should have this in Baltimore. I like the idea of extending your hands and measuring to see if you shirt isn't over the length of your fingers. If it is the cops could hit you with their nightstick. Otherwise you are free to go about your business.
Hexenjagd wrote:atomic wrote:Why does what people in Baltimore wear matter to you? Why do you want people with long shirts to get beat by the cops? I know you are trolling but this is ridiculous.
I was hopeful that this was for the whole city of St Louis but it is just for a ballpark? Maybe we should have this in Baltimore. I like the idea of extending your hands and measuring to see if you shirt isn't over the length of your fingers. If it is the cops could hit you with their nightstick. Otherwise you are free to go about your business.