K8teebug
Joined: August 03, 2004 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 4126
Re: Orioles....part 2?
September 09, 2014 at 01:47 PM UTC
#
TEN GAME LEAD EVERYONE.
TEN GAME LEAD.
James Ford
Joined: July 22, 2009 at 09:02 PM UTC
Posts: 5620
Re: Orioles....part 2?
September 09, 2014 at 02:32 PM UTC
#
I'm going to go with Tillman, Chen, and Gonzelez as my first three.
vansmack wrote:
Shemp wrote:
The rest probably depends on matchups.
This. How could you not start Tillman, Gonzalez and Norris against Anaheim?
vansmack
Joined: October 04, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 19725
Re: Orioles....part 2?
September 09, 2014 at 04:26 PM UTC
#
James wrote:
I'm going to go with Tillman, Chen, and Gonzelez as my first three.
Sure, against Detroit/KC, but not Anaheim.
Bud Norris is a career 4-0 in 6 starts against the Angels, with a 0.43 ERA.
Zero point four three. Chen is 0-1 in 2 starts with a 5.23.
James Ford
Joined: July 22, 2009 at 09:02 PM UTC
Posts: 5620
Re: Orioles....part 2?
September 09, 2014 at 04:40 PM UTC
#
But teams typically go with four starters, right? If so, add Norris and have Gausman be your long man.
vansmack wrote:
James wrote:
I'm going to go with Tillman, Chen, and Gonzelez as my first three.
Sure, against Detroit/KC, but not Anaheim.
Bud Norris is a career 4-0 in 6 starts against the Angels, with a 0.43 ERA. Zero point four three. Chen is 0-1 in 2 starts with a 5.23.
kmdobrz
Joined: February 10, 2000 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 3373
Re: Orioles....part 2?
September 10, 2014 at 04:20 PM UTC
#
FIELDING % DEFENSIVE EFFICIENCY ULTIMATE ZONE RATING DEFENSIVE RUNS SAVED
Orioles'
MLB 3rd 5th 2nd 2nd
Rank
Defensive Efficiency is the percentage of balls in play (i.e., fair balls that don't leave the park) that a defense converts into outs; Ultimate Zone Rating is an advanced play-by-play defensive metric available at FanGraphs; and Defensive Runs Saved is a complicated measure that makes use of all sorts of defensive calculations and arrives at an overall figure.
K8teebug
Joined: August 03, 2004 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 4126
Re: Orioles....part 2?
September 10, 2014 at 08:37 PM UTC
#
Chen pitched a perfect game through 5 today.
Orioles really running away with it.
Time to sweep the Yankees this weekend and really put a hurting on Derek Jeter night on ESPN.
James Ford
Joined: July 22, 2009 at 09:02 PM UTC
Posts: 5620
Re: Orioles....part 2?
September 10, 2014 at 08:48 PM UTC
#
hold on, not so fast.
remember two years ago when Joe Saunders was the go to guy?
K8teebug
Joined: August 03, 2004 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 4126
Re: Orioles....part 2?
September 11, 2014 at 01:26 PM UTC
#
Yes.
but, they still won!
Yankees sweep time.
vansmack
Joined: October 04, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 19725
Re: Orioles....part 2?
September 11, 2014 at 05:43 PM UTC
#
I think it's time to get excited when you're scoring a touchdown every game for a week…
K8teebug
Joined: August 03, 2004 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 4126
Re: Orioles....part 2?
September 11, 2014 at 07:48 PM UTC
#
You don't think it's time to get excited?
vansmack
Joined: October 04, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 19725
Re: Orioles....part 2?
September 11, 2014 at 09:49 PM UTC
#
K8teebug wrote:
You don't think it's time to get excited?
Of course, but that's because the Halo's have won 7 straight and scored a touchdown per game for the entire week.
kmdobrz
Joined: February 10, 2000 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 3373
Re: Orioles....part 2?
September 11, 2014 at 10:32 PM UTC
#
vansmack wrote:
K8teebug wrote:
You don't think it's time to get excited?
Of course, but that's because the Halo's have won 7 straight and scored a touchdown per game for the entire week.
Better save some of that for later….
vansmack
Joined: October 04, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 19725
Re: Orioles....part 2?
September 12, 2014 at 03:19 PM UTC
#
Chris Davis suspended for positive test.
#notshocked
jrpa
Joined: September 03, 2013 at 03:15 PM UTC
Posts: 29999
Re: Orioles....part 2?
September 12, 2014 at 03:27 PM UTC
#
vansmack wrote:
Chris Davis suspended for positive test.
#notshocked
Does Cabrera retroactively win a second Triple Crown? No offense to Orioles fans, but I agree: least surprising story ever.
vansmack
Joined: October 04, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 19725
Re: Orioles....part 2?
September 12, 2014 at 03:30 PM UTC
#
Julian, wrote:
I agree: least surprising story ever.
The only surprise here for me was that it was for amphetamines and not a more powerful performance enhancing drug.
jrpa
Joined: September 03, 2013 at 03:15 PM UTC
Posts: 29999
Re: Orioles....part 2?
September 12, 2014 at 03:31 PM UTC
#
Oh it was? I honestly hadn't heard about it until you just posted. How weird.
vansmack
Joined: October 04, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 19725
Re: Orioles....part 2?
September 12, 2014 at 03:41 PM UTC
#
Julian, wrote:
Oh it was? I honestly hadn't heard about it until you just posted. How weird.
ESPN about 10 minutes behind Smackies sources…
"I made a mistake taking Adderall. I had permission in the past, but I don't now."
K8teebug
Joined: August 03, 2004 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 4126
Re: Orioles....part 2?
September 12, 2014 at 04:01 PM UTC
#
sucks.
they don't need him to win though.
But, still…sucks.
James Ford
Joined: July 22, 2009 at 09:02 PM UTC
Posts: 5620
Re: Orioles....part 2?
September 12, 2014 at 04:05 PM UTC
#
Buck will plug somebody else in and it will work. It just seems like that kind of season.
StoneTheCrow
Joined: January 05, 2006 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 2297
Re: Orioles....part 2?
September 12, 2014 at 04:15 PM UTC
#
vansmack wrote:
"I made a mistake taking Adderall. I had permission in the past, but I don't now."
He's an idiot. Plain and simple.