kmdobrz
Joined: February 10, 2000 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 3373
Re: Orioles....part 2?
February 26, 2016 at 12:05 AM UTC
#
He
had a one year deal on the table - a $15.8M qualifying offer. If Boras is correct that industry revenues are split 57/43 in favor of the owners, then maybe this is a way for the players to flex some muscle. But why would you let a guy walk after one year after giving up the 14th pick in the draft to get him?
And of course
Fowler's agent rips the O's.
kmdobrz
Joined: February 10, 2000 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 3373
Re: Orioles....part 2?
February 26, 2016 at 01:12 AM UTC
#
Pretty predictable and a tired joke at this point, but…

vansmack
Joined: October 04, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 19725
Re: Orioles....part 2?
February 26, 2016 at 01:23 AM UTC
#
Nuke wrote:
He had a one year deal on the table - a $15.8M qualifying offer. If Boras is correct that industry revenues are split 57/43 in favor of the owners, then maybe this is a way for the players to flex some muscle. But why would you let a guy walk after one year after giving up the 14th pick in the draft to get him?
And of course Fowler's agent rips the O's.
I don't blame the O's at all for not giving in on the opt-out clause, but I'm really starting to worry about the bad advice the agents are giving their players around not accepting QO's and not taking financial security by asking for an opt out clause instead - and truthfully, the Fowler deal is not an opt out as it's a mutual option (with a $5m buyout). He left $2m+ on the table and he'll be a free agent for sure next season.
I know at least one team he won't be playing for in 2017….
kmdobrz
Joined: February 10, 2000 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 3373
Re: Orioles....part 2?
February 26, 2016 at 03:10 AM UTC
#
So, in effect, it's a mutual opt-out. Doesn't change the fact that when he wants to leave after one year he will. While leaving $2.8M on the table.
K8teebug
Joined: August 03, 2004 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 4126
Re: Orioles....part 2?
February 26, 2016 at 02:35 PM UTC
#
If he leaves after one year, the Orioles lose their draft pick and they're screwed. Good for them for telling him to go someplace else.
Having said that, I'm really sad he's not on the team.
vansmack
Joined: October 04, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 19725
Re: Orioles....part 2?
February 26, 2016 at 04:59 PM UTC
#
Nuke wrote:
So, in effect, it's a mutual opt-out. Doesn't change the fact that when he wants to leave after one year he will. While leaving $2.8M on the table.
It's mutual in that both sides have to agree to keep him. If he chooses to leave, he gets nothing. If the Cubs tell him to leave they pay him $5m. If he stays, he makes $9m in 2017 (up from $8m in 2016).
All this when he had a one year $15m deal on the table and 3 year $32m deal on the table. It's pretty obvious he won't make more than either of these offers when it's all said and done.
hutch
Joined: Unknown
Posts: 0
Re: Orioles....part 2?
February 26, 2016 at 05:01 PM UTC
#
so if the Orioles weren't stealing the Nats money would they be viable or permanent cellar dwellers?
What does that say about Baltimore if it can't field a competitive team?
kmdobrz
Joined: February 10, 2000 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 3373
Re: Orioles....part 2?
February 26, 2016 at 05:07 PM UTC
#
hutch wrote:
so if the Orioles weren't stealing the Nats money would they be viable or permanent cellar dwellers?
What does that say about Baltimore if it can't field a competitive team?
Are you referring to the non-competitive team that made the playoffs 2 out of the last 4 years?
jrpa
Joined: September 03, 2013 at 03:15 PM UTC
Posts: 29999
Re: Orioles....part 2?
February 26, 2016 at 05:08 PM UTC
#
I don't even like the Orioles and I thought that was ridiculous.
K8teebug
Joined: August 03, 2004 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 4126
Re: Orioles....part 2?
February 26, 2016 at 07:26 PM UTC
#
Nuke wrote:
hutch wrote:
so if the Orioles weren't stealing the Nats money would they be viable or permanent cellar dwellers?
What does that say about Baltimore if it can't field a competitive team?
Are you referring to the non-competitive team that made the playoffs 2 out of the last 4 years?
We were here first.
http://www.camdenchat.com/2016/2/5/10917292/orioles-nationals-masn-money-court-case
vansmack
Joined: October 04, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 19725
Re: Orioles....part 2?
February 26, 2016 at 07:28 PM UTC
#
K8teebug wrote:
We were here first.
http://www.camdenchat.com/2016/2/5/10917292/orioles-nationals-masn-money-court-case
At least you chose an unbiased opinion on the matter….
K8teebug
Joined: August 03, 2004 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 4126
Re: Orioles....part 2?
February 26, 2016 at 07:35 PM UTC
#
vansmack wrote:
K8teebug wrote:
We were here first.
http://www.camdenchat.com/2016/2/5/10917292/orioles-nationals-masn-money-court-case
At least you chose an unbiased opinion on the matter….
I had the worst visiting fan experience of my life at Nats Park. And I've been to Fenway in Orioles gear.
vansmack
Joined: October 04, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 19725
Re: Orioles....part 2?
February 26, 2016 at 10:19 PM UTC
#
K8teebug wrote:
I had the worst visiting fan experience of my life at Nats Park. And I've been to Fenway in Orioles gear.
Well, I'm sure that author took your fan experience into consideration when drafting that article. Whatever you do, make sure you base all of your opinions about the team on that one experience because that makes perfect sense.
This is a legal battle, pure and simple. Bud Selig made promises he couldn't keep (to both the Nat's and the A's) and the courts are left to figure it out. The Nats are going to throw everything they can and the O's are going to defend their turf. But this about the almighty dollar, not the fans.
I've been to almost every ball park, including Walgreen's Stadium a few times and had a good experience. Even dressed like this:
kmdobrz
Joined: February 10, 2000 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 3373
Re: Orioles....part 2?
February 26, 2016 at 10:45 PM UTC
#
I don't think this crap will be settled as long as Angelos is still alive.
vansmack
Joined: October 04, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 19725
Re: Orioles....part 2?
February 26, 2016 at 11:03 PM UTC
#
Nuke wrote:
I don't think this crap will be settled as long as Angelos is still alive.
Agreed. And I think the A's leave Oakland but not for San Jose.
kmdobrz
Joined: February 10, 2000 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 3373
Re: Orioles....part 2?
February 27, 2016 at 04:05 PM UTC
#
'Poor' Nats were only able to spend $165M in 2015 - no wonder they didn't win the Series.
vansmack
Joined: October 04, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 19725
Re: Orioles....part 2?
February 28, 2016 at 02:20 AM UTC
#
MLBPA's Tony Clark Concerned Over Recent FA Negotiations Between Orioles & Yovani Gallardo & Dexter Fowler
http:// by /1hUwanK