kmdobrz
Joined: February 10, 2000 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 3373
Re: Orioles....part 2?
February 21, 2016 at 03:59 AM UTC
#
hutch wrote:
Nuke wrote:
StoneTheCrow wrote:
Get Fowler and I'll feel better about this year. Not quite good but better.
I'll be good+ with Fowler.
optimist
There's a first time for everything.
vansmack
Joined: October 04, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 19725
Re: Orioles....part 2?
February 23, 2016 at 05:41 PM UTC
#
Hearing the Gallardo deal maybe unraveling due to results of his physical.
kmdobrz
Joined: February 10, 2000 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 3373
Re: Orioles....part 2?
February 23, 2016 at 07:15 PM UTC
#
vansmack wrote:
Hearing the Gallardo deal maybe unraveling due to results of his physical.
You heard right.
hutch
Joined: Unknown
Posts: 0
Re: Orioles....part 2?
February 23, 2016 at 07:16 PM UTC
#
man do the Orioles have the toughest physicals in the biz?
kmdobrz
Joined: February 10, 2000 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 3373
Re: Orioles....part 2?
February 23, 2016 at 07:56 PM UTC
#
hutch wrote:
man do the Orioles have the toughest physicals in the biz?
Think Lincecum would pass?
vansmack
Joined: October 04, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 19725
Re: Orioles....part 2?
February 23, 2016 at 08:21 PM UTC
#
Nuke wrote:
Think Lincecum would pass?

kmdobrz
Joined: February 10, 2000 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 3373
Re: Orioles....part 2?
February 23, 2016 at 09:31 PM UTC
#
Too bad - you almost had 4:20 on that post. You're losing your fastball.
vansmack
Joined: October 04, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 19725
Re: Orioles....part 2?
February 23, 2016 at 10:38 PM UTC
#
If I'm only losing a second on my fastball at my age, then I'm going to be a LOOGY for much longer than I anticipated.
vansmack
Joined: October 04, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 19725
Re: Orioles....part 2?
February 24, 2016 at 12:01 AM UTC
#
Nuke wrote:
Now get Fowler.
3 years, $35m.
Not sure if it was Gallardo's mills.
kmdobrz
Joined: February 10, 2000 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 3373
Re: Orioles....part 2?
February 24, 2016 at 02:14 AM UTC
#
vansmack wrote:
If I'm only losing a second on my fastball at my age, then I'm going to be a LOOGY for much longer than I anticipated.
What if you were a LOOGY with a scroogie?
vansmack
Joined: October 04, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 19725
Re: Orioles....part 2?
February 24, 2016 at 04:38 AM UTC
#
Nuke wrote: What if you were a LOOGY with a scroogie?
I'd be a retired millionaire helping some rookie with his cliches and keeping fungus off his shower shoes at Spring Training this month instead of a Chief of Staff 13 years from retirement.
K8teebug
Joined: August 03, 2004 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 4126
Re: Orioles....part 2?
February 24, 2016 at 02:36 PM UTC
#
vansmack wrote:
Nuke wrote:
Now get Fowler.
3 years, $35m.
Not sure if it was Gallardo's mills.
I'm guessing yes. Doesn't seem like he's passing his physical.
kmdobrz
Joined: February 10, 2000 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 3373
Re: Orioles....part 2?
February 24, 2016 at 03:12 PM UTC
#
vansmack wrote:
Hearing the Gallardo deal maybe unraveling due to results of his physical.
O's looking to restructure contract.
And there is agreement. And there was much rejoicing.
vansmack
Joined: October 04, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 19725
Re: Orioles....part 2?
February 25, 2016 at 05:50 PM UTC
#
Just got a message that Cubs swooped in on Fowler. Can't confirm.
jrpa
Joined: September 03, 2013 at 03:15 PM UTC
Posts: 29999
Re: Orioles....part 2?
February 25, 2016 at 05:52 PM UTC
#
vansmack wrote:
Just got a message that Cubs swooped in on Fowler. Can't confirm.
Rosenthal confirms.
1 year deal with mutual option. $8 mil base, $9 mil option, $5 mil buyout
kmdobrz
Joined: February 10, 2000 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 3373
Re: Orioles....part 2?
February 25, 2016 at 06:25 PM UTC
#
O's won't do an opt out.
K8teebug
Joined: August 03, 2004 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 4126
Re: Orioles....part 2?
February 25, 2016 at 07:08 PM UTC
#
Sucks, but better not to give up a draft pick for one year.
Still…sucks though.
kmdobrz
Joined: February 10, 2000 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 3373
Re: Orioles....part 2?
February 25, 2016 at 10:06 PM UTC
#
Duquette said from the beginning that the club would not offer any opt outs. So this late in the game the guy bolts because he can't get an opt out?
vansmack
Joined: October 04, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 19725
Re: Orioles....part 2?
February 25, 2016 at 11:57 PM UTC
#
Nuke wrote:
Duquette said from the beginning that the club would not offer any opt outs. So this late in the game the guy bolts because he can't get an opt out?
No, he bolted because he
did get an opt out elsewhere. If he didn't get one he surely takes the guaranteed money from the O's…
There's clearly been a titanic shift in control with this opt out nonsense. This continues until one player gets hurt.