kmdobrz
Joined: February 10, 2000 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 3373
Re: Orioles....part 2?
December 22, 2013 at 04:09 PM UTC
#
vansmack wrote:
Nothing would please me more than another AL East team picking him up:
Ken Rosenthal of FoxSports.com added that Rays team physician Koko Eaton examined Balfour in Tampa on Friday and performed a MRI on the pitcher's throwing shoulder, coming away surprised that the Orioles backed out of the deal.
?The MRI that I did on him today looked exactly the same as the MRI I did three years ago,? Eaton told the website. "It did not look normal compared to a person who does not play baseball for a living. But for someone who plays baseball for a living, it looked normal. There are abnormalities on the MRI as there are on every single baseball player?s. But three years ago, there was no issue, and he had pretty good performance when he was with Oakland.?
If Balfour doesn't sign with Tampa, expect several others to show interest in the proven closer. On Friday, Jim Duquette of MLB Network mentioned the Mariners, White Sox and Yankees as three teams that "need closers and would benefit with Balfour closing out games."
Eaton is also the guy who told Machado on the field that he had a torn ACL. Nice work, doc.
kmdobrz
Joined: February 10, 2000 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 3373
Re: Orioles....part 2?
December 23, 2013 at 07:51 PM UTC
#
vansmack wrote:
Knowing Angeles and his history, it's probably his accent.
The Orioles announced today that they claimed Australian-born pitcher Liam Hendriks, 24, off waivers from the Chicago Cubs.
There goes that theory. ;D
kmdobrz
Joined: February 10, 2000 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 3373
Re: Orioles....part 2?
December 27, 2013 at 02:59 PM UTC
#
RIP. The best there was.

vansmack
Joined: October 04, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 19725
Re: Orioles....part 2?
January 11, 2014 at 12:39 AM UTC
#
Alex Casillas. So you've got that going for you…
kmdobrz
Joined: February 10, 2000 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 3373
Re: Orioles....part 2?
January 13, 2014 at 10:58 PM UTC
#
According to ESPN's Buster Olney, the Orioles balked at signing Grant Balfour because of knee and wrist issues. It was largely assumed that the deal fell apart because of a shoulder concern, but Olney's source says otherwise.
atomic
Joined: August 27, 2013 at 01:49 PM UTC
Posts: 2093
Re: Orioles....part 2?
January 13, 2014 at 11:04 PM UTC
#
Shemp wrote:
According to ESPN's Buster Olney, the Orioles balked at signing Grant Balfour because of knee and wrist issues. It was largely assumed that the deal fell apart because of a shoulder concern, but Olney's source says otherwise.
At this point who even cares anymore? Whomever the source is should just the f up and sign someone already.
vansmack
Joined: October 04, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 19725
Re: Orioles....part 2?
January 14, 2014 at 12:06 AM UTC
#
atomic wrote:
sign someone already.
Delmon Young. There you go.
Apparently the O's are no longer shopping for a closer and will take care of it in house. They are now searching for a veteran starter…this is comical.
kmdobrz
Joined: February 10, 2000 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 3373
Re: Orioles....part 2?
January 14, 2014 at 02:48 AM UTC
#
I'll admit the offseason so far has been less than satisfying. But throwing money at below average players just because the rest of baseball is doing it doesn't make much sense either. I'm not a fan of Balfour anyway. He's a dick.
K8teebug
Joined: August 03, 2004 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 4126
Re: Orioles....part 2?
January 14, 2014 at 03:41 PM UTC
#
I'm with Shemp. I still trust Buck knows what he's doing.
vansmack
Joined: October 04, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 19725
Re: Orioles....part 2?
January 14, 2014 at 03:58 PM UTC
#
Shemp wrote:
I'll admit the offseason so far has been less than satisfying. But throwing money at below average players just because the rest of baseball is doing it doesn't make much sense either. I'm not a fan of Balfour anyway. He's a dick.
He's a dick who gets guys out. It's not the person for me as much as it's identifying a problem, trying to save money, then agreeing to shell out $15m, back tracking, deciding not to spend the money, and then deciding you don't have that problem any longer - despite doing nothing to fix it besides saving money.
If you could have fixed the problem from within the organization, don't you think they would have done it last season when JJ was struggling?
K8teebug wrote:
I'm with Shemp. I still trust Buck knows what he's doing.
Buck's not in charge of the off season. Do you trust Dan Duquette?
K8teebug
Joined: August 03, 2004 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 4126
Re: Orioles....part 2?
January 14, 2014 at 04:04 PM UTC
#
yes
atomic
Joined: August 27, 2013 at 01:49 PM UTC
Posts: 2093
Re: Orioles....part 2?
January 14, 2014 at 04:07 PM UTC
#
Shemp wrote:
I'll admit the offseason so far has been less than satisfying. But throwing money at below average players just because the rest of baseball is doing it doesn't make much sense either. I'm not a fan of Balfour anyway. He's a dick.
Santana and Garza are both above average and there are other guys out there.
kmdobrz
Joined: February 10, 2000 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 3373
Re: Orioles....part 2?
January 15, 2014 at 10:33 PM UTC
#
Looks like they signed Aceves to take Balfour's jerk role.
vansmack
Joined: October 04, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 19725
Re: Orioles....part 2?
January 15, 2014 at 10:40 PM UTC
#
Shemp wrote:
Looks like they signed Aceves to take Balfour's jerk role.
One thing is clear - the AL East sees something in that guy that the rest of the league doesn't.
atomic
Joined: August 27, 2013 at 01:49 PM UTC
Posts: 2093
Re: Orioles....part 2?
January 15, 2014 at 10:59 PM UTC
#
Well I hear he is a team player so that is a plus.
vansmack
Joined: October 04, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 19725
Re: Orioles....part 2?
January 16, 2014 at 09:37 PM UTC
#
I laughed audibly….
Joe (Chicago)
Thoughts on Orioles offseason?
Kieth Law (1:29 PM)
Has it started yet?
kmdobrz
Joined: February 10, 2000 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 3373
Re: Orioles....part 2?
January 16, 2014 at 10:47 PM UTC
#
vansmack wrote:
I laughed audibly….
Joe (Chicago)
Thoughts on Orioles offseason?
Kieth Law (1:29 PM)
Has it started yet?
Like beating a dead horse with these guys. Who cares? What kind of marks did they give the Angels after they made their big money moves? How did that turn out?
It's been an incredibly busy off-season of bottom-feeding. Some of these moves may even work out. And it's only January.
kmdobrz
Joined: February 10, 2000 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 3373
Re: Orioles....part 2?
January 17, 2014 at 11:10 PM UTC
#
Chris Davis goes from $3.3M to $10.35M. Quite a raise.
vansmack
Joined: October 04, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 19725
Re: Orioles....part 2?
January 17, 2014 at 11:35 PM UTC
#
Shemp wrote:
Chris Davis goes from $3.3M to $10.35M. Quite a raise.
A raise of roughly $345k per additional HR hit last season. Not bad - that's about what he was projected to get.
vansmack
Joined: October 04, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 19725
Re: Orioles....part 2?
January 23, 2014 at 05:04 AM UTC
#
Shemp wrote:
Like beating a dead horse with these guys.
Tyler Colvin deal on hold by Orioles due to physicalHis .241 average should have been reason enough…