Maybe we should just elect Trump president

Space wrote:
sweetcell wrote:
hence the plans to suppress non-white voters, limit non-white immigration, portraying whites as victims to ensure they get out and vote, etc…

I would be ok with this if all the white immigrants were liberals.
 
it's ok to limit immigration to whites, as long as they lean left?
sweetcell wrote:
Space wrote:
sweetcell wrote:
hence the plans to suppress non-white voters, limit non-white immigration, portraying whites as victims to ensure they get out and vote, etc…

I would be ok with this if all the white immigrants were liberals.
 
it's ok to limit immigration to whites, as long as they lean left?


What I was trying to say was that I'd like to see an immigration policy that preserves the current (diverse, but white majority) racial makeup of America. If that means limiting anyone, then so be it. That said, I'd want all the immigrants to be  liberals.
Based on birth rates to preserve a white majority you would need to only allow whites….


I have the opposite view…admit as many non whites as possible as white people have gone batshit crazy and are killing America
hutch wrote:
Based on birth rates to preserve a white majority you would need to only allow whites….


I have the opposite view…admit as many non whites as possible as white people have gone batshit crazy and are killing America


Maybe we need to limit the number of kids people have. Have some common sense, people.

Tax benefits for people who have 0-3 kids and increasing penalties for people who have four or more.
Space wrote:
I'd like to see an immigration policy that preserves the current (diverse, but white majority) racial makeup of America.

I don't like that at all…quota's on race of incoming immigrants
affirmative in-action

Trump is your guy if that's what your are looking for
Unquotable-hatch wrote:
Space wrote:
I'd like to see an immigration policy that preserves the current (diverse, but white majority) racial makeup of America.

I don't like that at all…quota's on race of incoming immigrants
affirmative in-action

Trump is your guy if that's what your are looking for


Oh yes, Trump's my man. Because immigration is the only issue. Please don't be a dumb liberal.
I think it is common sense to admit way more people and of course that will mean non whites as Swedes aren’t lining up….news flash: living in America is harsher than most industrialized countries

Most of our country is empty…our population density low…the reality is we need more people permanently coming in to renew ourselves or we end up looking like the US Senate Republicans
Space You are nuts…I have heard of the China one child policy but you are proposing limiting the right to have children due to racial considerations
Space wrote:
Unquotable-hatch wrote:
Space wrote:
I'd like to see an immigration policy that preserves the current (diverse, but white majority) racial makeup of America.

I don't like that at all…quota's on race of incoming immigrants
affirmative in-action

Trump is your guy if that's what your are looking for


Oh yes, Trump's my man. Because immigration is the only issue. Please don't be a dumb liberal.

I know that a lot of trupm-etts are voting on this issue alone, so I don't think it's that off
less about immigration, more about keeping America white again
hutch wrote:
Space You are nuts…I have heard of the China one child policy but you are proposing limiting the right to have children due to racial considerations


I did not say that. You are hearing what you want to hear. What I say is incentivize having low numbers of kids and penalize having high numbers of kids. Capitalism already does this naturally, just extend it through education and economic policy. Then maybe dumb people who have more kids than they can afford will better get the picture.  I said nothing about race.
Unquotable-hatch wrote:
Space wrote:
Unquotable-hatch wrote:
Space wrote:
I'd like to see an immigration policy that preserves the current (diverse, but white majority) racial makeup of America.

I don't like that at all…quota's on race of incoming immigrants
affirmative in-action

Trump is your guy if that's what your are looking for


Oh yes, Trump's my man. Because immigration is the only issue. Please don't be a dumb liberal.

I know that a lot of trupm-etts are voting on this issue alone, so I don't think it's that off
less about immigration, more about keeping America white again


Well shame on them for voting on one issue.

I know people who voted for Trump for the abortion issue alone. Shame on them too.
You talked about wanting to keep country majority white and penalizing people for having too many kids…since people who have more kids tend to be black or Latino I think we can all draw the conclusion
hutch wrote:
You talked about wanting to keep country majority white and penalizing people for having too many kids…since people who have more kids tend to be black or Latino I think we can all draw the conclusion


I'm against anyone having many kids, especially people who don't have the financial means. I grew up in an area that is currently 98.5% white, and lower middle class (current median household income, 44K). I'm against them having many kids.
Space wrote:
hutch wrote:
You talked about wanting to keep country majority white and penalizing people for having too many kids…since people who have more kids tend to be black or Latino I think we can all draw the conclusion


I'm against anyone having many kids, especially people who don't have the financial means. I grew up in an area that was probably 98% white, and lower middle class. I'm against them having many kids.


An incentive to abort…
Beyond existing tax credit for people who have kids I think government should stay out of people’s decisions on having kids…


You should write Stephen miller with your proposal
In Argentina there is a monthly pension per kid….ends up creating Space nightmare….China one child policy also created huge problems


Very dangerous area for government to involve itself in
Space wrote:
hutch wrote:
You talked about wanting to keep country majority white and penalizing people for having too many kids…since people who have more kids tend to be black or Latino I think we can all draw the conclusion


I'm against anyone having many kids, especially people who don't have the financial means. I grew up in an area that is currently 98.5% white, and lower middle class (current median household income, 44K). I'm against them having many kids.


I'll also add the Trump won the county I grew up in by +5 in a state that Hillary won by +22.
Space wrote:
Space wrote:
hutch wrote:
You talked about wanting to keep country majority white and penalizing people for having too many kids…since people who have more kids tend to be black or Latino I think we can all draw the conclusion


I'm against anyone having many kids, especially people who don't have the financial means. I grew up in an area that is currently 98.5% white, and lower middle class (current median household income, 44K). I'm against them having many kids.


I'll also add the Trump won the county I grew up in by +5 in a state that Hillary won by +22.



This is an argument for education not for penalizing people for having children!!
hutch wrote:
Space wrote:
Space wrote:
hutch wrote:
You talked about wanting to keep country majority white and penalizing people for having too many kids…since people who have more kids tend to be black or Latino I think we can all draw the conclusion


I'm against anyone having many kids, especially people who don't have the financial means. I grew up in an area that is currently 98.5% white, and lower middle class (current median household income, 44K). I'm against them having many kids.


I'll also add the Trump won the county I grew up in by +5 in a state that Hillary won by +22.



This is an argument for education not for penalizing people for having children!!


Perhaps. But it's also an argument that I'm not basing my thinking based on race. And as I said, educating people about the benefits of limiting family size based on financial means would be part of the program. So yes, education.