Sïdehätch wrote:
Where are the Knees located on a Newspaper?
fashion section.
fashion section.
Maybe we should just elect Trump president
fashion section.
in today's edition of stupid shit our president actually believes:
Trump says he would challenge impeachment in Supreme Court
https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/440358-trump-says-he-would-challenge-impeachment-in-supreme-court
you know how there is a test to become a citizen, where you have to prove there is a minimal threshold of knowledge one must possess? why isn't there the same for the presidency? like, having read the constitution, once?
and these reports that mr. glass ego doesn't want anyone talking about the threat of russians hacking the 2020 election… wait. last time it worked out well for him. nevermind.
Trump says he would challenge impeachment in Supreme Court
https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/440358-trump-says-he-would-challenge-impeachment-in-supreme-court
you know how there is a test to become a citizen, where you have to prove there is a minimal threshold of knowledge one must possess? why isn't there the same for the presidency? like, having read the constitution, once?
and these reports that mr. glass ego doesn't want anyone talking about the threat of russians hacking the 2020 election… wait. last time it worked out well for him. nevermind.
Donny,
I'm confused…first your boyfriend #1 (putin) has a very public date with your boyfriend #2 (lil' kim)
and they finished their meeting with champagne!
Looks like they are leaving you out of the 3some!
also…WTF Donny, I though you and Kim were buds
North Korea presented US with $2 million bill for care of Otto Warmbier
I'm confused…first your boyfriend #1 (putin) has a very public date with your boyfriend #2 (lil' kim)
and they finished their meeting with champagne!
Looks like they are leaving you out of the 3some!
also…WTF Donny, I though you and Kim were buds
North Korea presented US with $2 million bill for care of Otto Warmbier
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted]
deleted got deleted?
so this was the opposite of what I expected from the GOP
Donald Trump Jr. Is Subpoenaed to Testify to Senate Panel on Russia Contacts
This is a senate panel a committee controlled by Republicans!
Do we think this is a trick to exonerate trump more?
odds are DTJ will say something he shouldn't in front of congress and make things problematic for team trump
Donald Trump Jr. Is Subpoenaed to Testify to Senate Panel on Russia Contacts
This is a senate panel a committee controlled by Republicans!
Do we think this is a trick to exonerate trump more?
odds are DTJ will say something he shouldn't in front of congress and make things problematic for team trump
stollen-hätch wrote:
so this was the opposite of what I expected from the GOP
Donald Trump Jr. Is Subpoenaed to Testify to Senate Panel on Russia Contacts
This is a senate panel a committee controlled by Republicans!
Do we think this is a trick to exonerate trump more?
odds are DTJ will say something he shouldn't in front of congress and make things problematic for team trump
Oh, it'll work almost totally in favor of Reps. And then they can safely say that due diligence was done and, well, there's just nothing to see here.
goodness the crap that comes out of this mans mouth to the ears of people who believe every word he says….
“Under that deal, everybody in this room gets fired,” he continued. “All of the thousands of guys and women standing in these buildings get fired, they go because under the Green New Deal, they don’t like clean, beautiful natural gas. They don’t like anything.”
Trump noted that progressive politicians “sort of like wind even though it kills all the birds.”
“You want to see a bird cemetery? Go under a windmill sometime,” the president ranted. “You will see the saddest, you got every type of bird. You know, in California you go to jail for five years if you kill a bald eagle. You go under a windmill, you see them all over the place. Not a good situation.”
the irony is they could care less about protecting wildlife, habitats and endangered species….
if we are REALLY concerned about bird death (and I assure you the GOP isn't)
look at this chart…we need to kill the cats!
“Under that deal, everybody in this room gets fired,” he continued. “All of the thousands of guys and women standing in these buildings get fired, they go because under the Green New Deal, they don’t like clean, beautiful natural gas. They don’t like anything.”
Trump noted that progressive politicians “sort of like wind even though it kills all the birds.”
“You want to see a bird cemetery? Go under a windmill sometime,” the president ranted. “You will see the saddest, you got every type of bird. You know, in California you go to jail for five years if you kill a bald eagle. You go under a windmill, you see them all over the place. Not a good situation.”
the irony is they could care less about protecting wildlife, habitats and endangered species….
if we are REALLY concerned about bird death (and I assure you the GOP isn't)
look at this chart…we need to kill the cats!
I have a client that advocate for wind energy and they've had to cancel several meetings to do damage control when president grampa's brain starts melting and he yells about bird deaths.
Do-over wrote:
Found the perfect last minute holiday gift for your MAGA relatives
https://www.gofundme.com/thetrumpwall
Ha…this had a funny coda
The 'nearly broke' guy who started the Wall GoFundMe sponsor just paid for a ‘nearly’ $1 million yacht
A source close to the Florida man who raised over $22 million on GoFundMe in the “We The People Will Build the Wall” campaign just revealed today in their opinion money may be diverted to pay for a ‘million dollar’ yacht and high-flying lifestyle.
This article draws on the use of an anonymous source whose identity is being protected because they stepped forward to expose what they believe is a wrong-doing or possibly criminal fraud by the Wall GoFundMe campaign that received over 300,000 individual donations.***
This has to be illegal, no?
https://www.politico.com/story/2019/05/22/usda-agr...trump-policies-1340168?cid=apn
The Agriculture Department is moving nearly all its researchers into the economic effects of climate change, trade policy and food stamps – subjects of controversial Trump administration initiatives – outside of Washington, part of what employees claim is a political crackdown on economists whose assessments have raised questions about the president’s policies.
On March 5, the department began notifying people who were allowed to stay in Washington, but didn’t provide a comprehensive list, only telling employees in person if they made the cut.
But current and former employees compiled one anyway, covering all 279 people on staff, 76 of whom are being allowed to stay in Washington.
The current and former employees, all of whom requested anonymity out of fear of retaliation, say the specialties of those who are being asked to move corresponds closely to the areas where economic assessments often clash with the president’s policies, including tax policies, climate change, and the farm economy. The list, shared exclusively with POLITICO, shows a clear emphasis was placed on keeping employees whose work covers relatively non-controversial issues like crop planting over those whose research focused on areas sensitive to the administration.
“This was a clear politicization of the agency many of us loved for its non-partisan research and analysis,” a current ERS employee told POLITICO, claiming that department leaders picked those whose work was more likely to offend the administration and forced them to move “out or quit.”
https://www.politico.com/story/2019/05/22/usda-agr...trump-policies-1340168?cid=apn
The Agriculture Department is moving nearly all its researchers into the economic effects of climate change, trade policy and food stamps – subjects of controversial Trump administration initiatives – outside of Washington, part of what employees claim is a political crackdown on economists whose assessments have raised questions about the president’s policies.
On March 5, the department began notifying people who were allowed to stay in Washington, but didn’t provide a comprehensive list, only telling employees in person if they made the cut.
But current and former employees compiled one anyway, covering all 279 people on staff, 76 of whom are being allowed to stay in Washington.
The current and former employees, all of whom requested anonymity out of fear of retaliation, say the specialties of those who are being asked to move corresponds closely to the areas where economic assessments often clash with the president’s policies, including tax policies, climate change, and the farm economy. The list, shared exclusively with POLITICO, shows a clear emphasis was placed on keeping employees whose work covers relatively non-controversial issues like crop planting over those whose research focused on areas sensitive to the administration.
“This was a clear politicization of the agency many of us loved for its non-partisan research and analysis,” a current ERS employee told POLITICO, claiming that department leaders picked those whose work was more likely to offend the administration and forced them to move “out or quit.”
Does it matter?
If the entire executive, Senate and Supreme Court is conservative they can make anything up
Space wrote:
This has to be illegal, no?
https://www.politico.com/story/2019/05/22/usda-agr…trump-policies-1340168?cid=apn
fixed link: https://www.politico.com/story/2019/05/22/usda-agriculture-economists-trump-policies-1340168
i'm no lawyer, but seems like they have a strong case to make about political targeting/retribution.