Maybe we should just elect Trump president

What sidehatch said.

This is one of three populous states that Sanders needed more than a "good showing" - he needed to outright win and failing to do so means that he needs to win PA and CA by unattainable numbers (PA where he trails by 10 he now needs to win by 14 and CA by 15, where he now trails by 13 points).

He's simply running out of time and his ground game is considerably behind in the populous states.
vansmack wrote:
What sidehatch said.

…drops mic….
^that's some good stuff 
I love the looks that 'hill' makes
I enjoy, that the comments were disabled for the video.  how, interesting of cruz to not let the people, speak.  but yes, the wo/hillary/man gives face for days.  guurrl.

is it safe to say it is trump vs Hillary, now?  are people still thinking that some kind of craziness is going to erupt at the convention?   
walk,on,by wrote:
  are people still thinking that some kind of craziness is going to erupt at the convention?   

it is certain cra-cra will be present at the RNC…but looking like Trump will get the nom
I'm not sure the rest of the party likes cruz more than trump
hard to say

honestly they should just write of 2016 and focus on the future (and maybe even the present while they are still in congress)
the baltimore sun needs better fact checkers…




https://twitter.com/benjancewicz/status/723179179819307008

edit: i guess the sun stands by the name… and kosmette heard that the rally reeked of manure because they held in some field on the eastern shore that was recently covered in the stuff


http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/maryland/politics/bs-md-donald-trump-maryland-scene-20160420-story.html
ok Marylanders….who is Roque "Rocky" De La Fuente and are you voting for him?
SideBurnedOut wrote:
ok Marylanders….who is Roque "Rocky" De La Fuente and are you voting for him?


Yada wrote:
SideBurnedOut wrote:
ok Marylanders….who is Roque "Rocky" De La Fuente and are you voting for him?




yes i'm voting for him, 'cause that mofo will break my knee caps if i don't.
cool interactive: How the Rest of the Delegate Race Could Unfold - play with the vote % and see the impact on delegate counts.

for the GOP, The Donald needs to average 42% the rest of the way as a bare minimum if he wants to avoid a contested convention.  has there ever been a presidential nomination race where California was this important?

for the Dems, it's over.  even if Bernie gets 70% of the remaining votes, he doesn't close the gap.
both races are over.
sweetcell wrote:
has there ever been a presidential nomination race where California was this important?


Important is an interesting word, but the last time CA's primary mattered for the Republican's was 1976 when Reagan beat Ford, but still lost the nomination.  Some argued that it both cost the R's the 1976 general election and setup Reagan for the win in 1980.

For the Dem's it was 1972 when McGovern clinched over Humphrey.  Back then the CA primary was winner take all and CA was a huge deal.  Now both parties split the delegates based on votes and CA no longer sways the parties one way or another.

I would argue, however, that the most important Primary in CA history was RFK in 1968.  After winning and perhaps securing the nomination, he was assassinated leaving the hotel post victory speech.

sweetcell wrote:
for the Dems, it's over.  even if Bernie gets 70% of the remaining votes, he doesn't close the gap.


Please tell me that you did not just figure this out because of this interactive map…
Donald Trump has only one path to the GOP nomination. And he has himself to blame for it.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/04/18/donald-trump-has-only-one-path-to-the-gop-nomination-and-he-has-himself-to-blame-for-it/

vansmack wrote:
Please tell me that you did not just figure this out because of this interactive map…

the interactive put a number on what was known but not quantified. 
sweetcell wrote:
Donald Trump has only one path to the GOP nomination. And he has himself to blame for it.


That's a political journalist's take, not a political scientist's take.

hutch wrote:
both races are over.


Not yet.  While last night aided Trump a lot, he's not yet in the comfortable spot Hillary is in.  This can still be undone by Indiana and California.
vansmack wrote:
Donald wrote:
I've been saying Hillary would win this nomination since she conceded in 2008 so I think I got you beat… but they don't pay me the big bucks…so you got that small consolation..


Bitch Hutch, you joined this board in April of 2008, long after I was on record of calling that election over.  If you think I knew who you were or gave any credence to your opinion, you'd be wrong.  And don't limit that statement to elections.


With all due respect Vansmack you already established you don't care about anything I have to say so please just ignore me.. thanks much.