Sidehatch wrote:hutch wrote:
i don't think you understand the way Carville meant it…
didn't watch the vid ;D
use your imagination
Sidehatch wrote:hutch wrote:
i don't think you understand the way Carville meant it…
didn't watch the vid ;D
walk,on,by wrote:
What does it mean if trump wins new Hampshire, like everyone is saying he is?
vansmack wrote:Shh… don't let facts get in the way of the "Trump is a savvy politician who is winning the nomination" narrative that keeps getting discussed on here.
The primaries don't really start to matter until South Carolina and then Super Tuesday.

Relaxer wrote:. He becomes the "Oh thank god" candidate and he secures the nomination.
plus voting for the first Hispanic president gives everyone a warm feeling.

Sidehatch wrote:Relaxer wrote:. He becomes the "Oh thank god" candidate and he secures the nomination.
relaxer, you never cease with your awesomenessplus voting for the first Hispanic president gives everyone a warm feeling.
I highly doubt the people who want to build a wall and kick out 12 million will go to the polls to vote for Rico suave
But you do have a really salient point on the independents…who are pretty much the largest political party
oh boy
We are really in trouble if isis beheads some blond cheerleader

Relaxer wrote: He becomes the "Oh thank god" candidate and he secures the nomination.Or as I or Nate Silver would call it "the person the party establishment rallies around."
Relaxer wrote:ggw wrote:
Trump's kind of a sideshow. I think the better story of the primary season is that Hillary Clinton is losing to a 71-year old Socialist in both Iowa and New Hampshire.
I agree that the Trump thing looks and smells like a sideshow, but the fact is that he's been leading the GOP primaries for months now and there is no indication that he's going down any time soon. This is going well beyond the Gingrich/Cain/Bachmann/Paul/Romney 2012 shitshow where every candidate had his/her turn at the top of the polls. This is Trump out there, totally winging it with no filter, calling everyone idiots, insulting anyone who asks him a slightly penetrating question, and just climbing higher and higher.
The three hottest GOP candidates, Trump, Carson, and Fiorina, have never held any political office yet they account for more than 50 percent of poll "votes". This is the shitshow to watch, no matter what chagrined Republicans say.
jeffml wrote:
I wouldn't call Carson or Fiorina hot candidates. Without evangelical nutjobs, Carson's numbers will plummet down to where Fiorina is hovering - 2%. Both soon to be ex-candidates, thankfully.Relaxer wrote:ggw wrote:
Trump's kind of a sideshow. I think the better story of the primary season is that Hillary Clinton is losing to a 71-year old Socialist in both Iowa and New Hampshire.
I agree that the Trump thing looks and smells like a sideshow, but the fact is that he's been leading the GOP primaries for months now and there is no indication that he's going down any time soon. This is going well beyond the Gingrich/Cain/Bachmann/Paul/Romney 2012 shitshow where every candidate had his/her turn at the top of the polls. This is Trump out there, totally winging it with no filter, calling everyone idiots, insulting anyone who asks him a slightly penetrating question, and just climbing higher and higher.
The three hottest GOP candidates, Trump, Carson, and Fiorina, have never held any political office yet they account for more than 50 percent of poll "votes". This is the shitshow to watch, no matter what chagrined Republicans say.
hutch wrote:
just got this depressing email from Hillary.. she keeps asking for money but I don't care.. I dont' think money decides elections at all…..it just goes to overpaid idiots (consultants) and pays for stupid ads.. if money had much impact Jeb Bush would be doing far better.. of course money helps… I don't know.. I hate to contribute money to Hillary at this point..

kosmo wrote:
http://gawker.com/ted-cruz-super-pac-releases-new-ad-that-misspells-the-w-1757129328
Ted Cruz Super PAC Releases New Ad That Misspells the Word "Country"

Relaxer wrote:I greatly believe that Christie campaign number is fudged. There's no way its that low. There's just no way.
Of course that number represents Christie's personal pizza budget.