Maybe we should just elect Trump president

what is aleppo?
Three wrote:
what is aleppo?
Where is Cousin Oliver when Hutch needs him most?!
Three wrote:
what is aleppo?


The guy your most condescending Facebook friend is still voting for
I saw the best bumper sticker today:



GIANT METEOR
2016
End it already!
I still think that even with weakness the past few weeks Hillary is in the drivers seat because even in a worst case scenario the combination of VA/PA/NH/CO/NM cannot be beaten….but I'd be lying if I said I wasn't concerned….She's likely going to go into the debates needing to perform to expectations….She's just not proving to be a strong candidate it must be said….
Donald Trump?s supporters: Easy targets

Hillary Clinton was criticised last week for saying that half of Mr Trump?s supporters belong in a ?basket of deplorables?. But how deplorable are they? YouGov places 58% of Trump fans in the top quartile for ?racial resentment?, an indirect proxy for racism. And 51.8% would support a constitutional amendment allowing states to ban gay marriage. But caution is needed before declaring Mrs Clinton?s claim vindicated, writes The Economist data team

polls not good … freak out commencing…

I say this is just beginning….but evidently Donald Trump will have to do more than shoot somebody in broad daylight on 5th Ave. to bleed support…
vansmack wrote:
Space wrote:
vansmack wrote:
Trump is in danger of of losing white college graduates?won by every Republican presidential candidate since 1952 - which would be incredible.  He's getting hammered in college-educated women staggering margins of 57% to 38%, or more.  Married or otherwise….


Sure, but only 32.7% of women are college-educated.

http://www.statista.com/statistics/184272/educational-attainment-of-college-diploma-or-higher-by-gender/


Sure, but what's their percentage of voter turnout vs lesser educated?

It's also one of the fastest growing demographics.


What Separates Voters and Nonvoters?

For those that don't like numbers: The richer, older and more educated you are, the more likely you are to vote.
man things are in the shitter…

i'm dreading this debate… may not even watch it….it kind of feels like watching a world cup final with argentina playing to me…intense pressure….


i keep reading different things.. some people say hillary needs to be nice and take the high road.. others say she needs to wail on him, not be nice and prosecute his lies…  i tend to think its the second one….

i fear hillary comes into the debate needing a really good performance more than trump… trump can always count on debate 3 with the fox moderator


i know i need to buck up..

i did some "canvassing" for Hillary on Saturday…. here in North Arlington…. god I hate bothering people….. I've chipped in some money but I'm feeling less excited about chipping in money because it just seems like she has so much more than Trump….

I really don't understand this election cycle. .  .
I get it Hillary has been secretive, but it's apparently been a part of her character since her earliest days. It's probably a part of being a woman in and around the political field. 
Hillary's power hungry, but isn't anyone and everyone a little power hungry, is Donald Trump any less power hungry?
She's made a lot of money. . . Isn't that Trump's whole campaign?
The weirdest part I see is how in a way Trump is like a cartoon version of George W. Bush without the quaint compassionate conservativeism. People are literally saying he'll just surround himself with other people who will do the work. Or I'm voting for Pence. Maybe I'm wrong but the only thing I remember of the GWB years is a refund check that my family never received, years of war, and an economic bust.

People are multifaceted, and I can't see how Hillary can't better capitalize of the facet of her life and career that has seen her work very hard for others in this country. I can't believe that both her campaign and others opposed to Trump can't come up with anything better essentially than he's bad. That's not working, people don't care. People think that by voting Trump in they're making a militaristic statement that will somehow revolutionize this country by any means necessary.
totally agree… just pointing out the million Trump lies or saying he is a racist Hitler is just not working…. Its hard to believe that with all the money and paid consultants Hillary campaign has they can't do better… They're running against a guy who has virtually been a one man campaign and didn't even run any ads for months


the dilbert creator has done a pretty good job of explaining trump.. .


i think at this point what it comes down to is people seem to have decided they are sick and tired of hillary and just don't like her very much… all Trump has to do is demonstrate he is a plausible president.. in other words its more about people not liking Hillary than anything else…it doesn't matter the bazillion crazy and horrible things trump has said and done if people are sick and tired of Hillary… the "favorability rating" which Hillary and Trump are both really low but Hillary is up in doesn't seem to do much for her.. the Obama approval rating which is quite high seems to matter not.. the economy strengthening and creating jobs month after month seems to matter not….and one could go on listing all the reasons Hillary should be able to make a good argument for herself…. maybe if she stopped simply running as an anti-Trump "he has to be stopped" candiddate and spent more time on policy and running on her record she'd do better…. every single Hillary tv ad i have seen is basically little kids or old vets watching Trump say stupid shit…. well its obviously not working…. and if the campaign doesn't do some kind of reboot soon they will be in trouble.. heck, based on the latest polls they are in trouble…  they seem to just be set in this pattern of trying to find dirt on Trump  (as if there isn't enough disqualifying shit out there that is not disqualifying him),  calling Trump a racist and begging for money to run more anti-Trump ads, and waiting for Trump to say something crazy… I fear without a strong performance tonight where she puts him in his place/exposes him the bottom could fall out of her campaign…

take the debates.. HRC and her campaign are making a big deal about the moderators calling Trump out on his lies.. WTF? just have a good debate and call him a liar to his face all night while stating some FUCKING POLICY people like..  don't wait for fucking Lester Holt to go "ugh actually Mr Trump..".. and definitely don't act "nice" if a fake affable Trump shows up… cause tomorrow Trump will be back to being a jerkoff and this is your chance to confront him one on one.

take the debate prep… we got the HRC emphasizing for weeks that she is preparing for the debates.. meanwhile Trump says he is not preparing…. she comes in looking like a politician.. he comes in looking like a regular honest joe…  (BTW I am sure Trump is preparing but its smart for him to say he is not.. and its kind of dumb in my opinion for HRC and her camp to keep telling us she is locked away preparing and preparing for different Trump's including "affable Trump"?? WTF?)

i'm pretty ticked off at HRC campaign right now…I wont' even mention all the stupid fundraising emails i get from her about how the sky is falling and Trump is leading in this poll or that.. very inspiring HRC! well its not my fucking fault he is leading in the polls.. you've spent hundreds of millions of dollars on ads more than he has. do a better fucking job as a candidate.
You make it sound like they (the Dems) should have went with Bernie. Or any plausible candidate.
Space wrote:
You make it sound like they (the Dems) should have went with Bernie. Or any plausible candidate.


Sanders was the only other candidate so there were no other plausible candidates….also what is plausible one month can change very quickly…things are not static..
hutch wrote:
Space wrote:
You make it sound like they (the Dems) should have went with Bernie. Or any plausible candidate.


Sanders was the only other candidate so there were no other plausible candidates….also what is plausible one month can change very quickly…things are not static..


Jim Webb was my preference. O'Malley was in it too. The hate factor would have been less for both.
Space wrote:
hutch wrote:
Space wrote:
You make it sound like they (the Dems) should have went with Bernie. Or any plausible candidate.


Sanders was the only other candidate so there were no other plausible candidates….also what is plausible one month can change very quickly…things are not static..


Jim Webb was my preference.



ugghhh
Hillary  1
Donald 0
Lester -1
Space wrote:
Hillary  1
Donald 0
Lester -1


you're so pithy.
Space wrote:
Hillary  1
Donald 0
Lester -1


Don't forget Sean Hannity - 1
Damn, I'm so tired. I was up all night trying to give Sean Hannity a call.