i think the real question is . . . are they famous and rich enough to get "probation and all this will be wiped from your record in 6 months if you are good" like everybody else in the united states of freedom?
TBD
killsaly wrote:
I have a random thought. How controversial would a Favorite and Least Favorite board members thread be?
I think a positive board members thread is fine. But I am against negative ones. So you could have favorite categories.
killsaly wrote:
I have a random thought. How controversial would a Favorite and Least Favorite board members thread be?
boring and off the main page in two days. i mean, really, how much can you say atomic is a jerk, walkonby is a jerk, juilan is a jerk, sweetcell is a jerk, james is a jerk, hutch is a jerk, vansmack is weird?
;D I would not make a negative board thread (it was a joke).
http://publicshaming.tumblr.com/post/61388585374/americans-call-first-indian-american-miss-america
Random thought: A lot of Americans are extremely racist and stupid.
http://publicshaming.tumblr.com/post/61388585374/americans-call-first-indian-american-miss-america
Random thought: A lot of Americans are extremely racist and stupid.
So Towson University Cheerleading team was suspended from performing for the year for hazing. What do you think they did? Do you think they filmed it?
i think the real question . . . is why are they trying to hide it so much. interesting.
I wonder if gun nuts will still use the argument that we need armed gaurds to protect schools/office/bases after today? That obviously didn't work too well.
I worked in that building 11 years ago for about a year… Nuts.
I worked in that building 11 years ago for about a year… Nuts.
Yada wrote:
I wonder if gun nuts will still use the argument that we need armed gaurds to protect schools/office/bases after today? That obviously didn't work too well.
I worked in that building 11 years ago for about a year… Nuts.
I like how a member of the joint chief of staff had to be evacuated. I would think he would be leading the charge against the shooter.
Yada wrote:
I wonder if gun nuts will still use the argument that we need armed gaurds to protect schools/office/bases after today? That obviously didn't work too well.
I worked in that building 11 years ago for about a year… Nuts.
1) Apples and Oranges.
B) Because an armed guard was there the number of victims was substantially lower than what it could have been.
III) If it makes you feel safer to put up a 'no guns' sign then by all means put them up all around your house. When a bad guy breaks in I am sure he will go back to his car and leave his gun there before he comes in to rob you.
d) Nothing nutty about that, just facts.
atomic wrote:Yada wrote:
I wonder if gun nuts will still use the argument that we need armed gaurds to protect schools/office/bases after today? That obviously didn't work too well.
I worked in that building 11 years ago for about a year… Nuts.
I like how a member of the joint chief of staff had to be evacuated. I would think he would be leading the charge against the shooter.
He was just following the example of his Commander in Chief on how to react in a crisis.
Hold on. The report was he shot and killed the guard and took his gun to kill more people.
RatBastard wrote:atomic wrote:Yada wrote:
I wonder if gun nuts will still use the argument that we need armed gaurds to protect schools/office/bases after today? That obviously didn't work too well.
I worked in that building 11 years ago for about a year… Nuts.
I like how a member of the joint chief of staff had to be evacuated. I would think he would be leading the charge against the shooter.
He was just following the example of his Commander in Chief on how to react in a crisis.
RatBastard wrote:Yada wrote:
I wonder if gun nuts will still use the argument that we need armed gaurds to protect schools/office/bases after today? That obviously didn't work too well.
I worked in that building 11 years ago for about a year… Nuts.
1) Apples and Oranges.
B) Because an armed guard was there the number of victims was substantially lower than what it could have been.
III) If it makes you feel safer to put up a 'no guns' sign then by all means put them up all around your house. When a bad guy breaks in I am sure he will go back to his car and leave his gun there before he comes in to rob you.
d) Nothing nutty about that, just facts.
I knew this troll would pop up after that post.
Yada wrote:RatBastard wrote:Yada wrote:
I wonder if gun nuts will still use the argument that we need armed gaurds to protect schools/office/bases after today? That obviously didn't work too well.
I worked in that building 11 years ago for about a year… Nuts.
1) Apples and Oranges.
B) Because an armed guard was there the number of victims was substantially lower than what it could have been.
III) If it makes you feel safer to put up a 'no guns' sign then by all means put them up all around your house. When a bad guy breaks in I am sure he will go back to his car and leave his gun there before he comes in to rob you.
d) Nothing nutty about that, just facts.
I knew this troll would pop up after that post.
It is not trolling to post your true beliefs on a political subject on this board no matter how illogical and misguided your beliefs may be. If he were posting this on anti-gun message board that would be trolling.
Shemp wrote:RatBastard wrote:atomic wrote:Yada wrote:
I wonder if gun nuts will still use the argument that we need armed gaurds to protect schools/office/bases after today? That obviously didn't work too well.
I worked in that building 11 years ago for about a year… Nuts.
I like how a member of the joint chief of staff had to be evacuated. I would think he would be leading the charge against the shooter.
He was just following the example of his Commander in Chief on how to react in a crisis.
One of the best examples of leadership under pressure in the history of our country.
atomic wrote:Yada wrote:RatBastard wrote:Yada wrote:
I wonder if gun nuts will still use the argument that we need armed gaurds to protect schools/office/bases after today? That obviously didn't work too well.
I worked in that building 11 years ago for about a year… Nuts.
1) Apples and Oranges.
B) Because an armed guard was there the number of victims was substantially lower than what it could have been.
III) If it makes you feel safer to put up a 'no guns' sign then by all means put them up all around your house. When a bad guy breaks in I am sure he will go back to his car and leave his gun there before he comes in to rob you.
d) Nothing nutty about that, just facts.
I knew this troll would pop up after that post.
It is not trolling to post your true beliefs on a political subject on this board no matter how illogical and misguided your beliefs may be. If he were posting this on anti-gun message board that would be trolling.
Posting of facts is never trolling.
I told the guys on my team that acceptable topic of discussion were: Girls, Cars, Beer, Sports, TV, and movies as a couple of them keep talking about stupid geeky stuff.
"We will do everything in our power to make sure that whoever carried out this cowardly act is held responsible," the president added. "I want the investigation to be seamless."
1) What happened to "What difference does it make now that they are dead" (Hillary ClitOn)?
2) As seamless as the investigation into why our ambassador died in Bengazi?
What a total piece of scumbag shit we have in the oval office.
1) What happened to "What difference does it make now that they are dead" (Hillary ClitOn)?
2) As seamless as the investigation into why our ambassador died in Bengazi?
What a total piece of scumbag shit we have in the oval office.
Hmmm let's see this guy was given a gun in spite of him having two previous firearm related violations and a less than honorable discharge form being a squid for "a series of misconduct issues"…. In addition to all that, he was not authorized to have a firearm on him at this facility. Wonder what slack ass slept on their job and let this numb nuts in the yard let alone what moron government employee authorized him having a firearm in the first place? Maybe we need Bammy to create another government agency called the "lets check on all the other agencies to be sure they are doing their jobs right but really don't do anything other than suck money out of the economy because we don't want to offend the lazy government employees think that 'what dat be' is an actual English sentence and who wouldn't know an honest days work if they saw it agency"… Ya know if we pass just ONE MORE law and spend more of someone else's money then we will all be safe! LOL liberals. I swear you were only put on Earth to humor those with any sense of hard work and personal responsibility.
RatBastard wrote:
Hmmm let's see this guy was given a gun in spite of him having two previous firearm related violations and a less than honorable discharge form being a squid for "a series of misconduct issues"…. In addition to all that, he was not authorized to have a firearm on him at this facility. Wonder what slack ass slept on their job and let this numb nuts in the yard let alone what moron government employee authorized him having a firearm in the first place? Maybe we need Bammy to create another government agency called the "lets check on all the other agencies to be sure they are doing their jobs right but really don't do anything other than suck money out of the economy because we don't want to offend the lazy government employees think that 'what dat be' is an actual English sentence and who wouldn't know an honest days work if they saw it agency"… Ya know if we pass just ONE MORE law and spend more of someone else's money then we will all be safe! LOL liberals. I swear you were only put on Earth to humor those with any sense of hard work and personal responsibility.
Hey troll