TBD

Frank wrote:

so true.

walkonby wrote:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/17/tom-morello-paul-ryan-rage-against-the-machine_n_1795607.html?1345204995&ncid=edlinkusaolp00000009

nice!

I am so sick of these bands saying they are going to sue politicians for using their songs when the politicians are using their songs legally (Sivlersun pick-ups in this case.  Whom should be sued by the smashing pumpkins) 

And tom morello Romney/Ryan is almost exactly the same as Obama/Biden.  Wake up.  I thought you had a top notch education?

atomicfront wrote:

walkonby wrote:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/17/tom-morello-paul-ryan-rage-against-the-machine_n_1795607.html?1345204995&ncid=edlinkusaolp00000009

nice!

I am so sick of these bands saying they are going to sue politicians for using their songs when the politicians are using their songs legally (Sivlersun pick-ups in this case.  Whom should be sued by the smashing pumpkins) 

And tom morello Romney/Ryan is almost exactly the same as Obama/Biden.  Wake up.  I thought you had a top notch education?

Ever wonder why its always the Republicans getting into trouble??

that story had nothing to do with a band suing a politician for song use . . . or did i miss some other tangent?

i think they are yelling about facebook or twitter or something in some other thread over there yonder . . . but this story shows you just how "important" some people believe the stuff actually is.

http://news.yahoo.com/fake-followers-newest-ploy-accusation-politics-074836615.html

The NFL can't possibly start the season with these officials, right?

And the NHL……  ugh

hutch wrote:

walkonby wrote:
can we change the thread title to


the boring hutch versus ratbastard thread

I think we're agreeing on the baseball stuff…

I never take this as an A v B thing.  Nothing at all wrong with a little debate/discussion with opposing views.  No one is right or wrong when it come to opinions (well except for me, cause I am NEVER wrong).


I seriously do find soccer, baseball, and golf to be the three most boring sports ever (in order worst to least offensive).

RatBastard wrote:
No one is right or wrong when it come to opinions (well except for me, cause I am NEVER wrong).

I thought that was Vansmack

hutch wrote:

RatBastard wrote:
No one is right or wrong when it come to opinions (well except for me, cause I am NEVER wrong).

I thought that was Vansmack

That proves my point, I am right you are wrong! :) :) :)

This Assange thing is getting super intense. He is about to speak from London. http://globalrevolution.tv

P.S. Bradley Manning should be considered a national hero.

manning is gay.

no one cares about the gays.

Full statement here.

Short but basically what was expected.


Anyone remember when Obama said whistleblowers would and should be protected while he is in office? What happened there? Just one of a growing list of reasons to not vote for him. Looking more and more as though my president box will be left blank. Or maybe I will write J Mascis in just for giggles.

Az, I haven't decided whom to vote for yet either but I absolutely know that it will NOT be that corrupt traitorous puppet Obamney.

http://www.garyjohnson2012.com/
You can vote libertarian.

killsaly wrote:
http://www.garyjohnson2012.com/
You can vote libertarian.

I had considered him but after reading and hearing some interviews with him, I didn't feel comfortable with him either. Then again, may be worth it as a protest vote as well as the many, many others that the controlled two party system, by hook or by crook, won't let win.

Yeah, he's further to the right than Romney and Ryan on a bunch of issues. No thanks. I want a solid liberal candidate. And from a personal standpoint, my voting libertarian would basically be my voting against certain laws and benefits that help to keep me a contributing member of society.

azaghal1981 wrote:
Yeah, he's further to the right than Romney and Ryan on a bunch of issues. No thanks. I want a solid liberal candidate. And from a personal standpoint, my voting libertarian would basically be my voting against certain laws and benefits that help to keep me a contributing member of society.

You're crazy.. If you had even been voting in 2000, with this rationale you'd have voted for for Nader. How did that work out for you? You enjoyed the wars? The creation of a conservative majority on the Court?

Obviously who you vote for is irrelevant unless you live in Virginia anyways so I think you're giving this a bit too much thought!

I live in Maryland which went Gore. And if I didn't, I would think harder about my decision to not vote for Obama; living in MD does grant me a little more leeway like you implied.