TBD

Link in his profile.

Relaxer wrote:
Link in his profile.

Is this real life?

RatBastard wrote:
3) Anyone receiving any sort of public assistance should be drug tested and if they fail they lose the assistance for life.

for life?  really?  people can't reform?  one and done?  or is this little more than an excuse to exclude as many as possible, for whatever reason possible, as long as possible (forever)?

RatBastard wrote:
4) Anyone receiving any sort of public assistance should not be allowed to vote.  It is an absolute prima facia conflict of interest.

you have said some ignorant things on this board but that one is downright reprehensible.  poverty isn't a reason to be disenfranchised of your CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS (funny how the right-wingnuts pick and choose when it's convenient for a constitutional right to be respected).

if you are poor and need help . . . you can't vote?

fuck off dude.  go kill yourself.

we dont need you in our country

no really . . . go kill yourself.

now.

and create a web hosting site to document it.

consider yourself, cat banned from me

how could anybody think that.

have you fucked off and killed yourself, yet?

so people who get social security, medicade are also not going to be able to vote.  but that doesn't really matter anyways because old people don't usually have driver licenses or government id anyways…

what's next shall we close the Veterans  Administration,  not pass GI Bills, not doing anything about Corporate Welfare.

how about people who have worked several years for a company who then decide to close it's plants to ship jobs overseas.  did those people make poor choices?

kosmo wrote:
so people who get social security, medicade are also not going to be able to vote.  but that doesn't really matter anyways because old people don't usually have driver licenses or government id anyways…

what's next shall we close the Veterans  Administration,  not pass GI Bills, not doing anything about Corporate Welfare.

how about people who have worked several years for a company who then decide to close it's plants to ship jobs overseas.  did those people make poor choices?

1) Social Security is not government assistance.  It is your own money.  However we would be better off getting rid of that and allowing people to invest in their own retirement. As far as an ID goes, it is pretty damn easy to get a valid government issue ID in this country (well as long as you are a legal citizen).

2) If ANY federal level agency is redundant to the state level programs we ought to abolish the federal level agency.  Nothing but 100% waste of resources. As far as corporate welfare goes read my post about Mark SuckYourTurd and his facecrook minions.  The only reason they are getting away with making a shit ton of money and getting money BACK at tax time is because he paid Bammy (oops contributed to his campaign) a while back.

3) Not sure what the point is you are attempting to make but if the government would stop making it a disadvantage for a company to operate domestically then they would stay.

chaz wrote:

I take it that you are ASS-u-ming a casual relationship which there numbers don't even come close to proving.  On the other hand, one word.  Chicago

RatBastard wrote:

chaz wrote:

I take it that you are ASS-u-ming a casual relationship which there numbers don't even come close to proving.  On the other hand, one word.  Chicago

I'm guessing you mean causal relationship.

Just about any metric has it's anomalies and exceptions.

LA, AL, AK, MI, NE, HA, MA,RI, CO and NY are not anomalies.  It's simple.  Generally speaking, more guns equals more gun violence and less guns equals less violence. 

Now go back to posting snarky jpegs from your facebook.

Could you also argue that gun death rates is inversely proportional to per capita income? With the except of Alaska, which has such a high rate because it's mostly men living there?

Simply put, poor people kill each other more often.

Someone ought to come up with a calendar of the 'Morrissey Rant of the Day'. Here's a new one to file under the 'Prima Dona' collection.

"Morrissey is thankful for being invited to perform on Jimmy Kimmel Live tomorrow, February 26. However, he cannot morally be on a television program where the cast members of Duck Dynasty will also be guests. Morrissey would be honored to play the show, if Duck Dynasty were removed."

I would have asked what Duck Dynasty is but then I realized that I really didn't want to know.

Jaguar wrote:
Someone ought to come up with a calendar of the 'Morrissey Rant of the Day'. Here's a new one to file under the 'Prima Dona' collection.

"Morrissey is thankful for being invited to perform on Jimmy Kimmel Live tomorrow, February 26. However, he cannot morally be on a television program where the cast members of Duck Dynasty will also be guests. Morrissey would be honored to play the show, if Duck Dynasty were removed."

I would have asked what Duck Dynasty is but then I realized that I really didn't want to know.

Really? I'm curious!

reality show about a family that got wealthy selling stuff to duck hunters primarily a duck call.  just part of the rednecking of american via our tv boxes… no i don't watch it… i watch Best Week Ever for all my redneck reality tv.  serious beards on this show as well.

thanks Kosmo.


well obviously morrissey can't be on that show then….come on.

i wonder if it was a set up by kimmel….

i don't watch tv..thinking of getting rid of cable…without the beIN channel its worthless to me…just not sure i would save all that much due to the bundle deal…

James wrote:
Simply put, poor people kill each other more often.

Better yet, poor people with guns kill each other more often than poor people without guns.

So why is Ratbastard still alive?

Relaxer wrote:
So why is Ratbastard still alive?

Medicare?