TBD

Sidehatch wrote:

Yada wrote:
this is the last photo walky sent me a few weeks ago.

what's he doing with all those ladies?

i, like . . . tips

Julian, wrote:

atomic wrote:

Sidehatch wrote:

atomic wrote:

Sidehatch wrote:

atomic wrote:I can't understand as even my intern has a much better car than you.   

Ok, I request a photo of said intern in front of said car with a sign that says 'atomic intern' (not a bad band name?)

Tell you what, if you, James Ford, and Walky post your photos I will get that done..

and why do other people have to post so you will post?
also I don't really care what you look like…I want a pic of your intern with a sign that says "atomic intern"

And why do you want that?  Strange request.

Clearly he questions whether you really have an intern.

Seems like a silly thing to question.  Doesn't everyone have an intern do their boring work?

yeah I don't believe this intern thing either.. the reason its bullshit is that you mention it every third post….

hutch wrote:
yeah I don't believe this intern thing either.. the reason its bullshit is that you mention it every third post….

It is who I talk to all day long and play racquetball with at lunch.  I don't believe you guys don't have interns.  Just go down to HR and ask for one.

a soon to be crooked politician, beat a crooked politician . . . news at eleven.

walkonby wrote:
a soon to be crooked politician, beat a crooked politician . . . news at eleven.

yeah but at least he won't be the likely next Speaker of the House (second in line to the presidency)

hutch wrote:

walkonby wrote:
a soon to be crooked politician, beat a crooked politician . . . news at eleven.

yeah but at least he won't be the likely next Speaker of the House (second in line to the presidency)

The new guy's biggest campaign fight was against amnesty for illegal aliens.  I guess that is something we can all agree on. 

atomic wrote:

hutch wrote:

walkonby wrote:
a soon to be crooked politician, beat a crooked politician . . . news at eleven.

yeah but at least he won't be the likely next Speaker of the House (second in line to the presidency)

The new guy's biggest campaign fight was against amnesty for illegal aliens.  I guess that is something we can all agree on. 

Not me..I am for limited legalization and a path toward legalization for all…..its just a matter of time my friend… a matter of demographics….math…..there are at least 53-55 million hispanics legally in this country…reproducing at a faster rate than any other group…. unless the Republican Party wants to lose every election moving forward they're going to have to work with Democrats on the issue of immigration… no matter what some of their constituency thinks… how do Republicans win if they give up on states like Colorado, Nevada, Florida and New Mexico…. there is simply no path to the presidency without hispanic support in so many swing states… Even North Carolina has a lot of hispanics…

hutch wrote:

atomic wrote:

hutch wrote:

walkonby wrote:
a soon to be crooked politician, beat a crooked politician . . . news at eleven.

yeah but at least he won't be the likely next Speaker of the House (second in line to the presidency)

The new guy's biggest campaign fight was against amnesty for illegal aliens.  I guess that is something we can all agree on. 

Not me..I am for limited legalization and a path toward legalization for all…..its just a matter of time my friend… a matter of demographics….math…..there are at least 53-55 million hispanics legally in this country…reproducing at a faster rate than any other group…. unless the Republican Party wants to lose every election moving forward they're going to have to work with Democrats on the issue of immigration… no matter what some of their constituency thinks… how do Republicans win if they give up on states like Colorado, Nevada, Florida and New Mexico…. there is simply no path to the presidency without hispanic support in so many swing states… Even North Carolina has a lot of hispanics…

There already is a path to citizenship.  It is called enter the country legally.  Hispanic does not equal illegal.  It is rather racist of you to make that generalization.  I can only imagine the backlash by libs had a conservative done that.  The work that needs to be done is enforce the immigration laws we have now.  There is nothing we should do that will reward someone who by the very first act in entering the country, broke the law.  I do think we need to make one revision to our law, that being we need to modify the 'if you are born here you are a citizen' law to be 'if you are born here and your parents are legal and citizens then you are a citizen.

RatBastard wrote:

hutch wrote:

atomic wrote:

hutch wrote:

walkonby wrote:
a soon to be crooked politician, beat a crooked politician . . . news at eleven.

yeah but at least he won't be the likely next Speaker of the House (second in line to the presidency)

The new guy's biggest campaign fight was against amnesty for illegal aliens.  I guess that is something we can all agree on. 

Not me..I am for limited legalization and a path toward legalization for all…..its just a matter of time my friend… a matter of demographics….math…..there are at least 53-55 million hispanics legally in this country…reproducing at a faster rate than any other group…. unless the Republican Party wants to lose every election moving forward they're going to have to work with Democrats on the issue of immigration… no matter what some of their constituency thinks… how do Republicans win if they give up on states like Colorado, Nevada, Florida and New Mexico…. there is simply no path to the presidency without hispanic support in so many swing states… Even North Carolina has a lot of hispanics…

There already is a path to citizenship.  It is called enter the country legally.  Hispanic does not equal illegal.  It is rather racist of you to make that generalization.  I can only imagine the backlash by libs had a conservative done that.  The work that needs to be done is enforce the immigration laws we have now.  There is nothing we should do that will reward someone who by the very first act in entering the country, broke the law.  I do think we need to make one revision to our law, that being we need to modify the 'if you are born here you are a citizen' law to be 'if you are born here and your parents are legal and citizens then you are a citizen.

and lets apply it retroactively, so everyone is no longer a citizen and we are all illegals.

stevewizzle wrote:

RatBastard wrote:

hutch wrote:

atomic wrote:

hutch wrote:

walkonby wrote:
a soon to be crooked politician, beat a crooked politician . . . news at eleven.

yeah but at least he won't be the likely next Speaker of the House (second in line to the presidency)

The new guy's biggest campaign fight was against amnesty for illegal aliens.  I guess that is something we can all agree on. 

Not me..I am for limited legalization and a path toward legalization for all…..its just a matter of time my friend… a matter of demographics….math…..there are at least 53-55 million hispanics legally in this country…reproducing at a faster rate than any other group…. unless the Republican Party wants to lose every election moving forward they're going to have to work with Democrats on the issue of immigration… no matter what some of their constituency thinks… how do Republicans win if they give up on states like Colorado, Nevada, Florida and New Mexico…. there is simply no path to the presidency without hispanic support in so many swing states… Even North Carolina has a lot of hispanics…

There already is a path to citizenship.  It is called enter the country legally.  Hispanic does not equal illegal.  It is rather racist of you to make that generalization.  I can only imagine the backlash by libs had a conservative done that.  The work that needs to be done is enforce the immigration laws we have now.  There is nothing we should do that will reward someone who by the very first act in entering the country, broke the law.  I do think we need to make one revision to our law, that being we need to modify the 'if you are born here you are a citizen' law to be 'if you are born here and your parents are legal and citizens then you are a citizen.

and lets apply it retroactively, so everyone is no longer a citizen and we are all illegals.

Wait a minuto hombre,  my mother came here legally and my dad's family came here before there was a United States. 

okay, but i've got to imagine a lot of people would never have qualified as citizens if ratbastard's scenario was played out.

If you want to someday receive something from that Social Security fund you have been paying into, you should welcome every immigrant with open arms.  Cause those self-absorbed Baby Boomer fuckers are going to spend the next 25-30 years pillaging that shit.

thinking about the future is near impossible for the anti-immigrant simpletons.  they want to hate now.

sweetcell wrote:
thinking about the future is near impossible for the anti-immigrant simpletons.  they want to hate now.

I actually do not know anyone who is anti immigration.  That would be just plain silly.

RatBastard wrote:

sweetcell wrote:
thinking about the future is near impossible for the anti-immigrant simpletons.  they want to hate now.

I actually do not know anyone who is anti immigration.  That would be just plain silly.

you never randomly run into one of those nutjob "let's build a wall and keep 'em all out!" folks?

ggw wrote:
If you want to someday receive something from that Social Security fund you have been paying into, you should welcome every immigrant with open arms.  Cause those self-absorbed Baby Boomer fuckers are going to spend the next 25-30 years pillaging that shit.

I think most people do welcome LEGAL immigrants.  However there is no justifiable reason to reward someone when their very first act of entering the country is to break the law.  It is 100% pure common sense.  All I am asking is that if someone wants to come to this country and be a citizen is that they do so legally. 

stevewizzle wrote:

RatBastard wrote:

sweetcell wrote:
thinking about the future is near impossible for the anti-immigrant simpletons.  they want to hate now.

I actually do not know anyone who is anti immigration.  That would be just plain silly.

you never randomly run into one of those nutjob "let's build a wall and keep 'em all out!" folks?

I think building a wall makes sense.  That doesn't mean you are anti-immigrant.  We should have a process though.  And not every immigrant needs to be from Mexico.  And you would want young people to come in who are educated. 

stevewizzle wrote:

RatBastard wrote:

sweetcell wrote:
thinking about the future is near impossible for the anti-immigrant simpletons.  they want to hate now.

I actually do not know anyone who is anti immigration.  That would be just plain silly.

you never randomly run into one of those nutjob "let's build a wall and keep 'em all out!" folks?

Nope

Any non-citizen who gets a PhD from a U.S. institution should get an H-1B visa with his sheepskin.