TBD

man i overreact sometimes.  this thread that allows me to enter it and randomly throw up a thought, is . . . evil.  i should go buy some more beer today, and talk about that. 

What is it about Colorado?

this one woman on some msnbc show this morning talked exclusively about one thing basically during her entire time on the air . . . how video games and playing video games more than likely led to this kid doing it.  that will go over well.

Aren't you married?

Frank wrote:
I met the girl of my dreams last night.

Blonde
Attractive
Great body
Big tits
Loves football (soccer)
A WINE DISTRIBUTOR

Uh, he said BIG TITS.  I think that precludes the bonds of holy matrimony, pal.

James wrote:
Aren't you married?

Frank wrote:
I met the girl of my dreams last night.

Blonde
Attractive
Great body
Big tits
Loves football (soccer)
A WINE DISTRIBUTOR

Married guys dream too, y'know.

Oh man, hubba hubba

RatBastard wrote:
rad·i·cal   [rad-i-kuhl]
adjective
1. of or going to the root or origin; fundamental: a radical difference.
2. thoroughgoing or extreme, especially as regards change from accepted or traditional forms: a radical change in the policy of a company.
3. favoring drastic political, economic, or social reforms: radical ideas; radical and anarchistic ideologues.
4. forming a basis or foundation.
5. existing inherently in a thing or person: radical defects of character.

good, so we can agree on the definition.  newsflash: what obama is doing isn't radical.  plenty of precendent, and it's in keeping with his campaign platform from 2008.  it's radical to YOUR sensibilities, but he cannot be called subjectively radical.

(p.s. relaxer for president!!!)

i was sitting on the couch in my tank top and holey shorts, after hollering out the window at some kids of course, watching this hour long infomercial for "Micheal's" called "Craft Wars".  Anyways, I was snapped into reality when it dawned on me that shows about people apply glitter to stuff isn't very compelling, so i deleted it off the DVR.

walkonby wrote:
this one woman on some msnbc show this morning talked exclusively about one thing basically during her entire time on the air . . . how video games and playing video games more than likely led to this kid doing it.  that will go over well.

Well what about guns?  Why don't they ever think maybe we should not let everyone have guns?  Why does this enter peoples minds?  How many times does something like this happen when finally people wake up to the fact that people do not need guns.  Change the consitution.

azaghal1981 wrote:

RatBastard wrote:

azaghal1981 wrote:

RatBastard wrote:

azaghal1981 wrote:
He is in no way far enough to the left for me to support

No one in the history of our country has been as far radical left as Bammy.  Don't hold your breath waiting, better yet… ;)

And there's no way you believe this. Unless you really know nothing about nothing.

Just want to point out that "knowing nothing about nothing" would mean I know everything.

Touche. Fixed.


I still say you don't really believe that Obama is the most liberal politician in American history. There are countless senators and congressmen in office right now that are way far left of him.

 

Obama isn't liberal at all. Richard Nixon was more liberal than Obama. 

atomicfront wrote:

walkonby wrote:
this one woman on some msnbc show this morning talked exclusively about one thing basically during her entire time on the air . . . how video games and playing video games more than likely led to this kid doing it.  that will go over well.

Well what about guns?  Why don't they ever think maybe we should not let everyone have guns?  Why does this enter peoples minds?  How many times does something like this happen when finally people wake up to the fact that people do not need guns.  Change the constitution.

+1, not that it will ever happen.  rightly or wrongly, people will make the argument that had there been MORE guns in that theater, things might have gone differently (like more stray bullets…)

really not sure how to stuff this genie back into the bottle.

Last night, I was going to throw up a "we need an amendment to negate the 2nd amendment" for the sole purpose of trolling Ratbastard. Now, I'm totally sincere about it. Enough of this shit.

As opposed as I am to gun ownership. (and I am) The fact remains had the second amendment been abolished, this bloke in CO would still have obtained them and committed mass murder.

Unfortunately, the  reality is 'ban guns and only the bad people will have guns' and that's a step closer to complete anarchy.

It needs someone way above my payscale to figure out how to rid society of them.

As for Obama…I am confident that history will prove he's the worst president in mordern times. End of discussion on my part. (politics and message boards never work)

In case anyone is looking to buy teargas, http://www.keepshooting.com/clear-out-6oz-tear-gas-grenade.html

Honestly, why would something like this be legal?

You can't assume the Colo shooter would've been able to get a gun if they were illegal. From what's been reported, he was a medical school drop-out who worked at a bar, he wasn't a military guy. Can the average person go out and get a rocket launcher? No, because they're illegal for normal people to have and therefore, normal people don't know where to get them.

The argument that if guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns is straight up retarded. Yes, if guns are outlawed, only very certain outlaws will have guns, i.e. a miniscule fraction of the number of people who have and use guns today. You think most of those bonehead gun nuts would have any clue how to get a gun if they were outlawed? Give me a break. Gun violence would absolutely plummet if they were outlawed.

Precisely. This guy also appears to have a clean record with the exception of a traffic violation. He could have easily walked into a gun show, found the weapons he used last night and passed a background check with no problem. From the way it sounds, he probably acquired these weapons legally.

Relaxer wrote:
You can't assume the Colo shooter would've been able to get a gun if they were illegal. From what's been reported, he was a medical school drop-out who worked at a bar, he wasn't a military guy. Can the average person go out and get a rocket launcher? No, because they're illegal for normal people to have and therefore, normal people don't know where to get them.

The argument that if guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns is straight up retarded.Yes, if guns are outlawed, only very certain outlaws will have guns, i.e. a miniscule fraction of the number of people who have and use guns today. You think most of those bonehead gun nuts would have any clue how to get a gun if they were outlawed? Give me a break. Gun violence would absolutely plummet if they were outlawed.

This is why it's impossible to have a sensible discussion with some…someone with a different opnion on a subject than yourself is not automatically a retard.

Dope is illegal but all the stoners have no problem buying it on any given street corner. What makes you think guns would be any different?

Don't bother replying because I know I'm a retard if you don't agree with me.

Read it again, princess. I didn't call you a retard, I called the argument retarded. I did, however, call you a princess, princess, and kind of a dumb one at that.

And if you genuinely think it's just as easy to buy automatic weapons on any given street corner, then… well yeah, now I'm calling you retarded.

Bye!