TBD

See, that's the amazing thing about retarded republicans like this douchebag. President Obama will come out and say clearly that he supports people's right to own guns. But the stupid extremists like dickbag up there just blithely ignore that because it doesn't fit into their angry, low-class, no-dignity worldview based on ignorance, envy, and resentment and instead seize on some otherwise innocent statement and then torturously twist it to fit their extreme agenda.

It's all lies and distortions and attempted manipulation but it's just so ham-handed and obviously stupid that it boggles the mind that they can't even see how dumb and irrelevant they really are.

Is the anti-atomicfront script working for those that I passed it along to?

The board was pretty easy to read yesterday.

Yada wrote:
Is the anti-atomicfront script working for those that I passed it along to?

The board was pretty easy to read yesterday.

yup, loving it.  it's a little glitchy, for some reason i still see the "introductions" thread (maybe because he's the thread starter? maybe i have a setting wrong?) but otherwise it's been a week of no a'front.  so much more pleasant.

Yada wrote:
Is the anti-atomicfront script working for those that I passed it along to?

The board was pretty easy to read yesterday.

could you pm this script to me???

chaz wrote:

Yada wrote:
Is the anti-atomicfront script working for those that I passed it along to?

The board was pretty easy to read yesterday.

could you pm this script to me???

Could you modify the script and send it to me so I don't get any Chaz posts?

sweetcell wrote:

Yada wrote:
Is the anti-atomicfront script working for those that I passed it along to?

The board was pretty easy to read yesterday.

yup, loving it.  it's a little glitchy, for some reason i still see the "introductions" thread (maybe because he's the thread starter? maybe i have a setting wrong?) but otherwise it's been a week of no a'front.  so much more pleasant.

i found it was glitchy with chrome. works perfect with firefox, may want to try that.

atomicfront wrote:
Could you modify the script and send it to me so I don't get any Chaz posts?

It could be modified to block everybody.  We could have a zen forum.  Complete silence.

grateful wrote:

atomicfront wrote:
Could you modify the script and send it to me so I don't get any Chaz posts?

It could be modified to block everybody.  We could have a zen forum.  Complete silence.

Excellant idea. 

stevewizzle wrote:

sweetcell wrote:

Yada wrote:
Is the anti-atomicfront script working for those that I passed it along to?

The board was pretty easy to read yesterday.

yup, loving it.  it's a little glitchy, for some reason i still see the "introductions" thread (maybe because he's the thread starter? maybe i have a setting wrong?) but otherwise it's been a week of no a'front.  so much more pleasant.

i found it was glitchy with chrome. works perfect with firefox, may want to try that.

If you have me blocked why the heck you are still talking about me?  I am sure you will turn off your script all the time to see what you are missing.

grateful wrote:


It could be modified to block everybody.  We could have a zen forum.  Complete silence.

the sound of one hand clapping

atomicfront wrote:

stevewizzle wrote:

sweetcell wrote:

Yada wrote:
Is the anti-atomicfront script working for those that I passed it along to?

The board was pretty easy to read yesterday.

yup, loving it.  it's a little glitchy, for some reason i still see the "introductions" thread (maybe because he's the thread starter? maybe i have a setting wrong?) but otherwise it's been a week of no a'front.  so much more pleasant.

i found it was glitchy with chrome. works perfect with firefox, may want to try that.

If you have me blocked why the heck you are still talking about me?  I am sure you will turn off your script all the time to see what you are missing.

I have not yet received the script so I can still see your posts, but I don't think Sweetcell can even see what you are saying.

atomicfront wrote:
If you have me blocked why the heck you are still talking about me?  I am sure you will turn off your script all the time to see what you are missing.

They can still see what you're saying if somebody quotes you.

chaz wrote:
could you pm this script to me???

PM sent.

chaz wrote:
I have not yet received the script so I can still see your posts, but I don't think Sweetcell can even see what you are saying.

yup.  i see when others quote a'front so it's not perfect but i don't see his posts.  as soon as i see "Quote from: atomicfront" at the top of other's posts, i just skip past it.

and yeah, it works better in firefox.

sweetcell wrote:

chaz wrote:
could you pm this script to me???

PM sent.

chaz wrote:
I have not yet received the script so I can still see your posts, but I don't think Sweetcell can even see what you are saying.

yup.  i see when others quote a'front so it's not perfect but i don't see his posts.  as soon as i see "Quote from: atomicfront" at the top of other's posts, i just skip past it.

and yeah, it works better in firefox.

Yeah you are really ignoring me.  Every post you  make is about me.  Why are you so infatuated with me?

Man you are some haters.  ::)

Who cares if JarJar Binks is on the cover of Rollingstone?

Yada wrote:
Who cares if JarJar Binks is on the cover of Rollingstone?

i love stupid people who scream up and down the stars and stripes about no censorship, freedom of speech and the press . . . until its something they dont like.

walkonby wrote:

Yada wrote:
Who cares if JarJar Binks is on the cover of Rollingstone?

i love stupid people who scream up and down the stars and stripes about no censorship, freedom of speech and the press . . . until its something they dont like.

Also, I'm pretty sure many other villainous folks in history have been on the cover of a magazine.

I'm taking odds on <a href="http://www.usbg.gov/return-titan">Corpse Flower</a> vs. <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/kate-middleton/10179413/Live-Royal-baby-watch.html">Royal Baby</a>.

grateful wrote:
I&#039;m taking odds on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.usbg.gov/return-titan&quot;&gt;Corpse Flower&lt;/a&gt; vs. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/kate-middleton/10179413/Live-Royal-baby-watch.html&quot;&gt;Royal Baby&lt;/a&gt;.

I'll put 20 on the flower.

BTW - am I the only one that smells stink when I open the flower web page?  The mind is a crazy thing….