Things Smackie Thinks You Need to Know...

Originally posted by nkotb:
And what's the word on Rock Band coming out for the Wii? Ever gonna happen? I'm working on deciding which new system I should pick up, and the Wii is the likely front-runner. Still, without Rock Band, I feel empty :(
"Absolutely" was the only answer I've ever heard with no timelime or official announcement ever made. I know Harmonix was first worried about downloadable content, but they fixed that with GHIII.

I've only played the wii and not taken a close look at it - does it use USB for additional controllers?
Originally posted by nkotb:
I'm working on deciding which new system I should pick up, and the Wii is the likely front-runner. Still, without Rock Band, I feel empty :(
Just so you know, I was on the fence about wii vs 360 for a long time. Around August I was nearly 99% decided that it was going to be the wii. Then I started thinking about all of the cool non-video game features of the 360 - downloadable content, HD output, HD-DVD capabilities, rentable movies, external hard drives, Media Server etc - and coupled that with the list of games that were available between the two and was back to deciding which camp to be in. After playing Rock Band over Xmas in So Cal, I bought both the 360 and Rock Band on the way back to SF.

I think it's a matter of time before the wii controller aspects make their way to other consoles. For the wii to catchup to the 360, it's a lot more than a firmware upgrade. It's an entire hardware upgrade or entirely new model altogether.

That's just my two cents.
Motorola's profits dropped 84% last quarter, but this article makes no mention of the iPhone when discussing why the #3 cell phone maker in the world is continuing to struggle. Amazing.
excerpt from "The Untold Story: How the iPhone Blew Up the Wireless Industry"

Six months later, on June 29, 2007, the iPhone went on sale. At press time, analysts were speculating that customers would snap up about 3 million units by the end of 2007, making it the fastest-selling smartphone of all time. It is also arguably Apple's most profitable device. The company nets an estimated $80 for every $399 iPhone it sells, and that's not counting the $240 it makes from every two-year AT&T contract an iPhone customer signs. Meanwhile, about 40 percent of iPhone buyers are new to AT&T's rolls, and the iPhone has tripled the carrier's volume of data traffic in cities like New York and San Francisco.

But as important as the iPhone has been to the fortunes of Apple and AT&T, its real impact is on the structure of the $11 billion-a-year US mobile phone industry. For decades, wireless carriers have treated manufacturers like serfs, using access to their networks as leverage to dictate what phones will get made, how much they will cost, and what features will be available on them. Handsets were viewed largely as cheap, disposable lures, massively subsidized to snare subscribers and lock them into using the carriers' proprietary services. But the iPhone upsets that balance of power. Carriers are learning that the right phone â?? even a pricey one â?? can win customers and bring in revenue. Now, in the pursuit of an Apple-like contract, every manufacturer is racing to create a phone that consumers will love, instead of one that the carriers approve of. "The iPhone is already changing the way carriers and manufacturers behave," says Michael Olson, a securities analyst at Piper Jaffray.

(…)

So that summer (2004), while he publicly denied he would build an Apple phone, Jobs was working on his entry into the mobile phone industry. In an effort to bypass the carriers, he approached Motorola. It seemed like an easy fix: The handset maker had released the wildly popular RAZR, and Jobs knew Ed Zander, Motorola's CEO at the time, from Zander's days as an executive at Sun Microsystems. A deal would allow Apple to concentrate on developing the music software, while Motorola and the carrier, Cingular, could hash out the complicated hardware details.

Of course, Jobs' plan assumed that Motorola would produce a successor worthy of the RAZR, but it soon became clear that wasn't going to happen. The three companies dickered over pretty much everything â?? how songs would get into the phone, how much music could be stored there, even how each company's name would be displayed. And when the first prototypes showed up at the end of 2004, there was another problem: The gadget itself was ugly.

Jobs unveiled the ROKR in September 2005 with his characteristic aplomb, describing it as "an iPod shuffle on your phone." But Jobs likely knew he had a dud on his hands; consumers, for their part, hated it. The ROKR â?? which couldn't download music directly and held only 100 songs â?? quickly came to represent everything that was wrong with the US wireless industry, the spawn of a mess of conflicting interests for whom the consumer was an afterthought. Wired summarized the disappointment on its November 2005 cover: "YOU CALL THIS THE PHONE OF THE FUTURE?"

Even as the ROKR went into production, Jobs was realizing he'd have to build his own phone. In February 2005, he got together with Cingular to discuss a Motorola-free partnership.
Originally posted by sweetcell:
excerpt from "The Untold Story: How the iPhone Blew Up the Wireless Industry"

Yeah. I read that a couple weeks ago and thought - which part of that is the untold story?

It's just amazing to me that an AP writer would write about the troubles at Motorola and not even mention the iPhone? Everybody knows that Motorola relied too heavily on the RAZR and thought it best to leave it alone while the market advanced around it. It's a no brainer.
This is another interesting decision.

AT&T's Broadband Customers Get Unlimited Wi-Fi, but those of you on our crappy 80kbps cellular network, uh, we can't help ya.

Heaven forbid you see what an iPhone can do on a real network, you'll probably demand more from us.
Playing catchup… I was really hoping that Apple would finally come out with something I really wanted to buy… There were rumours of a headless computer that fell somewhere between a mac mini and mac pro which would have suited me nicely. i have no interest in getting an iMac and kosmette just got a macbook… instead we get an overhyped appletv upgrade, no HD drive option, and still nothing that resembles what a proper media center/home theater machine would have…
Originally posted by vansmack:
Originally posted by vansmack:
#1 - 2008 will be the year that internet access at your seat will finally be available on airplanes, starting with longer flights and working its way to the commuter flights (which is backwards, but at least its coming).
BetaBlue doesn't count, but it's a start:

BetaBlue: It's one small step for in-flight Wi-Fi
Inching closer…Southwest plans high-speed Internet trials. The big difference here is that it will use satellites instead of ground signals - this will make broad deployment much easier.
Originally posted by kosmo:
Playing catchup… I was really hoping that Apple would finally come out with something I really wanted to buy…
You're spot on Kosmo. MacWorld was a bit of a disappointment this year. Although, today they finally released the pink Nano smackette has been waiting for since her pink mini died some time ago…
Originally posted by god's shoeshine:
i have a (nonprem) question: where is my travel channel hd?
I really thought it was going to be today, but alas, not yet. Soon though.

The 101 was in HD this morning, which is good. I watched Peter, Bjorn and John last night and was thinking it was odd that The 101 was not in HD. Well, it is now.
i demand anthony bordain in hd
Originally posted by kosmo:
Playing catchup… I was really hoping that Apple would finally come out with something I really wanted to buy… There were rumours of a headless computer that fell somewhere between a mac mini and mac pro which would have suited me nicely. i have no interest in getting an iMac and kosmette just got a macbook… instead we get an overhyped appletv upgrade, no HD drive option, and still nothing that resembles what a proper media center/home theater machine would have…
http://scobleizer.com/2007/12/27/the-macmini-hdtv-revolution/
Originally posted by god's shoeshine:
i demand anthony bordain in hd
heh, funny… i can't help you with the HD, but in two weeks i'll be responsible for transcoding and delivering burdain's show to iTunes.
Originally posted by pdx pollard:
http://scobleizer.com/2007/12/27/the-macmini-hdtv-revolution/
Help me out with how using a Mac Mini and an HDTV is revolutionary? Won't this work with any computer with a video switch ($10) and long cable ($5)?

I hooked my computer up to my HDTV the day I bought the TV (sometime back in April 2006). With a wireless mouse and keyboard, I sit on my couch and web browse, stream TV shows off of network web sites, etc. Did I mention it's just an ugly old PC that has never been graced by Steve Jobs?
Originally posted by vansmack:

I hooked my computer up to my HDTV the day I bought the TV (sometime back in April 2006). With a wireless mouse and keyboard, I sit on my couch and web browse, stream TV shows off of network web sites, etc. Did I mention it's just an ugly old PC that has never been graced by Steve Jobs?
I've had my laptop hooked up to my TV for 3 years. That article is the most ridiculous techno-ejaculation I've ever read.
Originally posted by kosmo:
I was really hoping that Apple would finally come out with something I really wanted to buy…
I really thought that Apple could do for the internet what they did for the Mp3. Make it usably portable.

What I really want is a ~$300-$500 wireless internet-only device the size of an ultraportable laptop with longer battery life. It should be flashed based with limited storage no thicker than an inch, touch mouse and full qwerty keyboard. It doesn't need an expensive processor or much RAM as it's only going to do one thing - surf the net. No fancy game graphics driver because it only has to deal with streaming quality video. I don't need any drives, no gadgets or goodies, no extra software other than reader plug ins.

It would stream all media but not allow for on-device storage (other than simple OS and browser plugins). That's what the one USB port would be for - flash drives for file storage.

If all of this can be packaged in a device the size of the iPod Touch, why can't I get one the size of the ultra-portable laptop?
Originally posted by vansmack:
Help me out with how using a Mac Mini and an HDTV is revolutionary? Won't this work with any computer with a video switch ($10) and long cable ($5)?
it isnt, it was just addressing what many people use as their apple version of a media center, I replaced my old imac with a macmini 6 months ago and have it hooked up to the hdtv via hdmi and to my receiver with the digital out, but not because it is revolutionary, but because that is what I manage all my music on

You are aware of how ridiculous Robert Scoble is right, what would you expect from a former Microsoft evangelist
Originally posted by pdx pollard:

You are aware of how ridiculous Robert Scoble is right, what would you expect from a former Microsoft evangelist
Strange, but I have never heard of him, actually (and surprisingly don't even remember the Economist article cited on his wiki page). I bet he is the sole author of his wiki page too.