Things Smackie Thinks You Need to Know...

vansmack wrote:
Well, long story but our quest to purchase in the city has hit a bit of a rut, and we're tired of our current place and it's downfalls, so we each made a top 3 of what we wanted in our next place, rent or own:

Smackie: (1) DirecTV, (2) Parking, (3) Warmer Weather (we live on the ocean side of the city which is nice, but foggy in the summer)

Smackette: (1) Warmer Weather, (2) Parking, (3) Puppy Friendly.

Our potential next place is in a warmer part of the city (lower Haight), has a parking spot and is pet friendly.  A place I saw allowed DirecTV but didn't allow for pets.  So it's hard to argue for a non-pet friendly place instead of DirecTV when there are TV alternatives available, but no pet alternatives.




i have the perfect place. . . .it's nice and warm, you have your own garage and can have as many puppies as you'd like. . .it's called pleasant hill.  come and join us.
Venerable wrote:
i have the perfect place. . . .it's nice and warm, you have your own garage and can have as many puppies as you'd like. . .it's called pleasant hill.  come and join us.


I'll take renting in Lower Haight over owning in the East Bay. Every day. Thanks.

Enjoy that traffic while I enjoy the view….

yes, you can look at dense urbanity (and a failing mass transit system). . .or you can have a view of a mountain.

Venerable wrote:
yes, you can look at dense urbanity (and a failing mass transit system). . .or you can have a view of a mountain.


I don't consider 3800 feet a "mountain," but then again, I'm not from San Jose.
vansmack wrote:
Venerable wrote:
yes, you can look at dense urbanity (and a failing mass transit system). . .or you can have a view of a mountain.


I don't consider 3800 feet a "mountain," but then again, I'm not from San Jose.


it's called "Mt. Diablo"  at least for now. . .looking forward to being able to vote on whether or not to rename it Mt. Reagan in 3 years.
isnt that really the same name
godsshoeshine wrote:
isnt that really the same name


ooooh, good one; i didn't not clarify.  never shit a shitter.

You could call it Mt. Vansmack for all I care (actually, I would care - I'd be insulted), 3800 feet is not a mountain.

If there's no snow and you can't board it, it's not a mountain.
Today, the Half Smackie's Age Plus 7 Theorem is raised to 25.
happy b-day, smax!

wait, you're 36?!?  huh.  guess i was confounding "younger" with "immature".  my bad.
sweetcell wrote:
happy b-day, smax!

wait, you're 36?!?  huh.  guess i was confounding "younger" with "immature".  my bad.


Or my striking resemblance to Adonis….
vansmack wrote:

Or my striking resemblance to Adonis….


This guy?
ggw wrote:
This guy?


We can't all be blessed with this guys great looks:



(that was for Markie and Lulu)
(smackie, http://www.virginmedia.com/images/mcenroe-bad.jpg is timing out for me… dunno if anyone else can see the image)
I still use that Jack Kramer Pro Staff when I play.
sweetcell wrote:
(smackie, http://www.virginmedia.com/images/mcenroe-bad.jpg is timing out for me… dunno if anyone else can see the image)


Mirror:

vansmack wrote:
Today, the Half Smackie's Age Plus 7 Theorem is raised to 25.


The maximum age of a woman who would even conceivably want to be with you? ;)
100 days until the World Cup.
(question about world cup moved here)