ggw
Joined: December 16, 2001 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 14237
Re: Musicological banter
November 18, 2014 at 03:33 AM UTC
#
azaghal1981 wrote:
That industry middle man he says is no more is still there. It's taken the form of the PR industry rather than the record industry. Music doesn't randomly find its way from Bandcamp to Pitchfork. It's a nice thought but no. Yes, it's cheaper/easier to get your music out there than ever before but it's just as easy/cheap for everyone else. Music's still filtered through just as many channels unless you have an influential friend or two. Not to mention the fact that everyone seems to need to have management/a booking agent nowadays from bands that play houses to arena acts. Just ask Seth how often the Club talks to a band itself as opposed to an agent when booking it.
I don't fundamentally disagree with you, but I do think filters serve a purpose. Maybe I am just getting old, but I don't have the time to invest in discovering stuff on my own as much as I used to. So I rely more on filters/middlemen than I did in the past. And I think there are a lot more middlemen and a lot more granular filters today, so things aren't totally as bad as they once were.
azaghal1981
Joined: June 17, 2004 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 12035
Re: Musicological banter
November 18, 2014 at 03:55 AM UTC
#
Oh I'm not saying there's anything wrong with the filters at all. Albini (who appears to have a problem with them) seems to think that they no longer exist which is ridiculous.
azaghal1981
Joined: June 17, 2004 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 12035
Re: Musicological banter
November 18, 2014 at 04:01 AM UTC
#
I also wonder what his beef with Prince is. Thought everyone liked Prince.
i am gay and i like cats
Joined: Unknown
Posts: 0
Re: Musicological banter
November 18, 2014 at 12:53 PM UTC
#
I just watched an interview with riff raff. I'm stupid now.
grateful
Joined: October 15, 2008 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 11564
Re: Musicological banter
November 18, 2014 at 04:02 PM UTC
#
I filter all my new music recommendations through hutch.
azaghal1981
Joined: June 17, 2004 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 12035
Re: Musicological banter
November 30, 2014 at 11:41 PM UTC
#
Rogue Riderhood
Joined: Unknown
Posts: 0
Re: Musicological banter
November 30, 2014 at 11:45 PM UTC
#
I saw they were doing that… That is cool it is nearly $1000. It was a couple hundred the last time I saw something about it.
beetsnotbeats
Joined: April 26, 2002 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 5756
Re: Musicological banter
December 02, 2014 at 09:22 PM UTC
#

Audio, July 1970, Vol. 54, No. 7, page 46
azaghal1981
Joined: June 17, 2004 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 12035
Re: Musicological banter
December 11, 2014 at 03:51 AM UTC
#
Oh wow.
This is out. I remember Jaguar first posting about it here many years ago.
miss pretentious
Joined: April 23, 2007 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 1775
Re: Musicological banter
December 11, 2014 at 04:00 AM UTC
#
azaghal1981 wrote:
Oh wow. This is out. I remember Jaguar first posting about it here many years ago.
thank you for the post!
azaghal1981
Joined: June 17, 2004 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 12035
Re: Musicological banter
December 11, 2014 at 04:10 AM UTC
#
Oops, it wasn't Jag.
It was Hoya.
azaghal1981
Joined: June 17, 2004 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 12035
Re: Musicological banter
December 17, 2014 at 10:19 PM UTC
#
Happy belated anniversary, #tripmetal. You have made the world (mostly Twitter) a slightly funnier place.
beetsnotbeats
Joined: April 26, 2002 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 5756
Re: Musicological banter
December 18, 2014 at 09:44 PM UTC
#
eMusic: 1998-2014?If you?ve never heard of eMusic, then maybe that?s the point. Here?s an email leaked from inside digital distributor The Orchard to Digital Music News concerning the struggling music ?e-tailer??
kosmo
Joined: September 23, 1999 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 16329
Re: Musicological banter
December 18, 2014 at 09:56 PM UTC
#
I would be a serious sad panda if emusic went bust..
jrpa
Joined: September 03, 2013 at 03:15 PM UTC
Posts: 29999
Re: Musicological banter
December 18, 2014 at 09:57 PM UTC
#
MDR-7506notBeats wrote:
eMusic: 1998-2014?
If you?ve never heard of eMusic, then maybe that?s the point. Here?s an email leaked from inside digital distributor The Orchard to Digital Music News concerning the struggling music ?e-tailer??
Kosmo gently weeps and says "Goodnite Sweet Prince" to no one in particular.
jrpa
Joined: September 03, 2013 at 03:15 PM UTC
Posts: 29999
Re: Musicological banter
December 18, 2014 at 09:57 PM UTC
#
kosmo wrote:
I would be a serious sad panda if emusic went bust..
See my above comment.
beetsnotbeats
Joined: April 26, 2002 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 5756
Re: Musicological banter
December 18, 2014 at 10:36 PM UTC
#
kosmo
Joined: September 23, 1999 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 16329
Re: Musicological banter
December 18, 2014 at 11:45 PM UTC
#
i'm always amused by the people who said that eMusic abandoned the indie music fan when they added major labels… it certainly didn't stop people from downloading all the major label stuff and all the exalted indie labels/bands everyone carries on about are all pitchfork approved "indie"… you rarely ever saw CDBaby indie releases topping any off their charts.
i know emusic has lots of detractors but it absolutely worked for me. i easily follow 50+ labels via the site and never have a problem get my months credits worth. many of those labels who do not have domestic physical distribution, so eMusic was a way to get at a reasonable price lots of my favorite recent releases. i have bought a total of five tracks via iTunes, a handful via Amazon and Bandcamp.
vansmack
Joined: October 04, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 19725
Re: Musicological banter
December 19, 2014 at 12:18 AM UTC
#
Given their business model, it's impressive that they've lasted this long.
I'm sorry Kosmo - I know you were a big fan. I blame Evil Santa.