grateful wrote:Would the legal minutia been better suited for the Smackie thread?
Wrong thread.
Musicological banter
Julian, wrote:Sidehatch wrote:I've been down a weird google rabbit hole about desecration of a corpse and necrophilia laws for the last hour or so from state to state and I do not think I will be eating for several days.Julian, wrote:
Wait, am I reading that correct? His tattoos were altered postmortem?
That's my understanding
Where can you view that type of material and not get fired from your job?
Yada wrote:
Where can you view that type of material and not get fired from your job?
http://law.justia.com doesn't exactly have photos of the various crimes accompanying the text of various federal and state codes.
My sort of justification for tagging/not tagging something NSFW is, "hey, if someone walks behind you and glances at your computer screen while you're at work, is it immediately going to draw their attention because its obvious at a glance this has no valid business purpose?" A page of dry text (regardless of text's content): probably not. Nude/nearly-nude .gifs of people? Probably. Footage of open wounds or gore? Probably.
Obviously everyone's workplace and computer-use policies are going to be different and people need to know where they work and what's fine and what isn't but I don't understand how my request things virtually no employer is going to be cool with tagged NSFW so people can make an informed decision is so ridiculous.
It must suck to work in such an environment…
killsaly wrote:Yeah, I've really had to train myself to make it 8 hours without enjoying gratuitous nudity and autopsy photos.
It must suck to work in such an environment…
I'm not saying that you need to look at them while you're at work. I'm saying it sucks to work at a place where you would get fired for looking at a picture of a woman in a bikini, or a picture of someone's open wound.
killsaly wrote:I cannot imagine actually getting fired for looking at that stuff, personally. Could I see a female employee complaining to HR about it being a hostile workplace because someone is watching Kate Upton do the Cat Daddy dance in a bikini and a huge amount of my time gets wasted over it? Sure.
I'm not saying that you need to look at them while you're at work. I'm saying it sucks to work at a place where you would get fired for looking at a picture of a woman in a bikini, or a picture of someone's open wound.
Snitches get stitches.
^creating a hostile forum environment ;D
Sidehatch wrote:I feel unsafe. Ergo, Reddit is moments away from shutting the board down.
^creating a hostile forum environment ;D
The DC Public Library is creating a DC Punk Archive in the Washingtoniana collection. They want donations of photos, fliers, records/tapes/CDs, zines, posters or video/film.
http://dclibrary.org/punk
http://dclibrary.org/punk
Sidehatch wrote:
Closer to home is the heartfelt tribute to Josh Burdette, the legendary security man at Washington DC?s cult 9:30 Club venue and close friend of Turner?s, who took his own life in 2013. Turner pulls up the leg of his trousers to reveal a tattoo of a dragon, which he had inked Burdette?s memory. ?He was covered in dragon tattoos,? recalls Turner. ?All of his dragons had closed eyes and he said that when he died he wanted their eyes opened. So his tattooist went and did it, which is fucking intense.?
Fucking intense is right!
Sidehatch wrote:
The DC Public Library has created a DC Punk Archive in the Washingtoniana collection. They want donations of photos, fliers, records/tapes/CDs, zines, posters or video/film.
http://dclibrary.org/punk
FTFY
UM College Park has one, too. Curated by people who were there.
1970's Donald Trump looks like Josh Homme if he was a used car salesman.
http://www.jambase.com/Articles/125841/Man-Dies-In-Police-Custody-After-Leaving-Widespread-Panic-Concert
drugs, scare me now, in my older age.
drugs, scare me now, in my older age.
azaghal1981 wrote:^^ Azaghal1981 taking potshots at Eighteenth Street Lounge!
Yes, better than that one DC sacred cow.