The 2020 thread....

we are getting places….space now properly knows how to use 'getting a hard on for'

Space wrote:
I would use the term "hard on for" but I learned in another thread that that means you're against something.

i thought is just meant that it got you really excited about it, but could be either positively or negatively… help?

sweetcell wrote:

Space wrote:
I would use the term "hard on for" but I learned in another thread that that means you're against something.

i thought is just meant that it got you really excited about it, but could be either positively or negatively… help?

I think it's like Aloha

Ok people..time to put your bitcoin where your mouth is

I want some delegate count guestimates

Biden 500
Bloomberg 200
Sanders 475
Warren      150

I'm feeling a surge for biden,
Bloomberg is fading
sanders will do well, but will come in second

Side-hatchetations wrote:
Ok people..time to put your bitcoin where your mouth is

I want some delegate count guestimates

Biden 500
Bloomberg 200
Sanders 475
Warren      150

I'm feeling a surge for biden,
Bloomberg is fading
sanders will do well, but will come in second

If that’s the count, it’s gonna be Biden.

sweetcell wrote:

Space wrote:
I would use the term "hard on for" but I learned in another thread that that means you're against something.

i thought is just meant that it got you really excited about it, but could be either positively or negatively… help?

In my mind, hard ons are always positive, except that one time in 10 grade English class.

It’s really hard to predict…I haven’t even looked at polls not that there are many since SC but expect Sanders will clean up in TX and especially CA which will make it impossible for Biden to win tonight…but he will live to keep fighting

I expect something like Sanders 700 Biden 500 and the rest split amongst the losers

hutch wrote:
It’s really hard to predict…I haven’t even looked at polls not that there are many since SC but expect Sanders will clean up in TX and especially CA which will make it impossible for Biden to win tonight…but he will live to keep fighting

Four of 538's five scenarios have Biden getting the most votes tonite, FWIW.

Really seems to come down to how many people stick with Bloomberg vs coalescing around Biden.

Wow ok my spitballing is way off then….I have Sanders doing far better in CA and TX than Nate Silver does….


I guess I subscribe to Nats Silver Scenario 4 but with Sanders doing far better in CA and TX

So do you think Bloomberg tottaly Hindiberg'ed and is done for
that's what Team Biden needs

Well it doesn’t matter what I think cause we will know in a few hours although not sure how fast CA and TX count votes…

they also said that we might not know CA for a few days because of the Mail in votes

Side-hatchetations wrote:
they also said that we might not know CA for a few days because of the Mail in votes

You're welcome. 

I mean, I could have turned my ballot in to City Hall earlier, but with the candidates dropping like flies lately it just made more sense to put it in the mail THIS MORNING! 

i am sure there will be enough to project what is happening in CA and the final delegate counts

https://twitter.com/PizzaToThePolls

Pizza to the Polls
@PizzaToThePolls
We send pizzas to polling places with long lines. Send us reports and we'll send in the za. Track the progress on our website: https://polls.pizza

Wow CNN calls VA for Biden immediately!!!

hutch wrote:
Wow CNN calls VA for Biden immediately!!!

crazy innit?  with 0.0% of the polling stations reporting in, VA = biden. 

this isn't helping with the whole "it's fixed for biden" narrative.

Oh you haven’t heard of exit polling?



Anyway am hearing its about Biden  47 Sanders 25 Warren 11 Bloomberg 11


They also called Vermont for Sanders right away…is that also part of establishment conspiracy?

NC called for Biden

hutch wrote:
NC called for Biden

Bama too.

He’s crushing his projected margin there and in Massachusetts and several other places.

Biden is having a hell of a night so far.