Starsky wrote:
Who?
Who?
Dylan. Didn't he sell the rights to his whole catalog?
Starsky wrote:
Who?
Who?
excontradiction wrote:Starsky wrote:
Who?
Who?
Dylan. Didn't he sell the rights to his whole catalog?
Julian, wrote:Yada wrote:I mean we should thank him. The proliferation of music venues in the District has been horrible for us, the consumers, compared to the halcyon days of his monopoly. I can barely even enjoy live music anymore knowing there are other options out there too.notme wrote:
to put dc9, songbyrd and pieshop out of business
#thanksSeth
sweetcell wrote:Julian, wrote:Yada wrote:I mean we should thank him. The proliferation of music venues in the District has been horrible for us, the consumers, compared to the halcyon days of his monopoly. I can barely even enjoy live music anymore knowing there are other options out there too.notme wrote:
to put dc9, songbyrd and pieshop out of business
#thanksSeth
there was never a monopoly, let's not erect strawmen.
a proliferation of venues can be detrimental to the consumer: there is a limited supply of talent, so more clubs competing for same artists = need to offer more $$ = added cost past on to consumer. of course it's no better at the other end of the spectrum.
sweetcell wrote:Look undeniably there are more venue options in the area now than 15 years ago when IMP consumed a much larger % of the market share. And Seth very much so got on here all the time and told us the sky would fall and concerts would become astronomically high if FSS opened and there was more competition in the area. You’re parroting this line.Julian, wrote:Yada wrote:I mean we should thank him. The proliferation of music venues in the District has been horrible for us, the consumers, compared to the halcyon days of his monopoly. I can barely even enjoy live music anymore knowing there are other options out there too.notme wrote:
to put dc9, songbyrd and pieshop out of business
#thanksSeth
there was never a monopoly, let's not erect strawmen.
a proliferation of venues can be detrimental to the consumer: there is a limited supply of talent, so more clubs competing for same artists = need to offer more $$ = added cost past on to consumer. of course it's no better at the other end of the spectrum.
Starsky wrote:Who claimed they were? I don’t recall ever thinking this much less stating it.
Also the fact we have so many new venues and venues on the way sort of disproves the idea that IMP is somehow a reason why venues are closing (not that they are).
Julian, wrote:
And Seth very much so got on here all the time and told us the sky would fall and concerts would become astronomically high if FSS opened and there was more competition in the area. You’re parroting this line.
Julian, wrote:
And the reality is, that was ass. DC was consistently much higher than other comparable markets for tickets 15 years ago and now: not so much. A DC show (especially ones at The Clib) much more look comparable to other markets now. Prices did not inflate in DC any quicker than they inflated in Philly just because now IMP had to bid vs someone else. The market doesn’t contain that sort of elasticity.
Hatch-atar wrote:
venues that somewhat recently closed: Blowtel, wonderland ballroom, U Street, velvet lounge
am I missing any?
Starsky wrote:
18th St Lounge
Hatch-atar wrote:The building was 60% of the charm. :(Starsky wrote:
18th St Lounge
re-opening in blagden alley and keeping name
sweetcell wrote:Im going to reply to this when I’m in front of a real keyboard and not on a phone. You’re very much being dishonest about what I’m saying and you don’t understand the natural financial constraints to supply and demand, bro. Now if you’ll excuse me, boarder favorites Julian Baker and Lucy Dacus gotta rock Richmond.Julian, wrote:
And Seth very much so got on here all the time and told us the sky would fall and concerts would become astronomically high if FSS opened and there was more competition in the area. You’re parroting this line.
i realize you're quick to dismiss everything seth says out of hand, but basic market theory is undeniable. just because you don't like the speaker doesn't mean you can ignore supply and demand.Julian, wrote:
And the reality is, that was ass. DC was consistently much higher than other comparable markets for tickets 15 years ago and now: not so much. A DC show (especially ones at The Clib) much more look comparable to other markets now. Prices did not inflate in DC any quicker than they inflated in Philly just because now IMP had to bid vs someone else. The market doesn’t contain that sort of elasticity.
there is a pandora's box of variable that contribute to the historical trends of concert tickets (a highly localized product). pointing to a single variable and saying it proves why the price of a ticket here is (or isn't) comparable to the price of a ticket somewhere else isn't insightful. you look at philly and see that trend, i look at NYC and i don't see it.
Julian, wrote:Hatch-atar wrote:The building was 60% of the charm. :(Starsky wrote:
18th St Lounge
re-opening in blagden alley and keeping name