Julian, wrote:RatBastard wrote:I believe this was Yada, and I said I'd take any that were not up to his standards.
1) (Maybe hutch?) We discussed some older LP albums that i have that I'll give to you.
No, sir.
Julian, wrote:RatBastard wrote:I believe this was Yada, and I said I'd take any that were not up to his standards.
1) (Maybe hutch?) We discussed some older LP albums that i have that I'll give to you.
Yada wrote:Julian, wrote:RatBastard wrote:I believe this was Yada, and I said I'd take any that were not up to his standards.
1) (Maybe hutch?) We discussed some older LP albums that i have that I'll give to you.
No, sir.
Julian, wrote:RatBastard wrote:I am actually pretty skeptical that 11 year olds were aware – on an All Star team, not a team that'd played together all year – that some of the kids, who they may have met just a few weeks before this, lived on the other side of an imaginary dividing line the kids never knew about to begin with. I played Little League; I had no idea where the district boundaries were.hutch wrote:
color me skeptical that the kids didn't know….
the kids didn't know where they lived? :)
I mean, it should still 100% get stripped away from this team but I default to "the kids didn't know" until I see evidence otherwise. Occam's razor.
Julian, wrote:RatBastard wrote:I believe this was Yada, and I said I'd take any that were not up to his standards.
1) (Maybe hutch?) We discussed some older LP albums that i have that I'll give to you.
RatBastard wrote:I was under the impression the time period that the all stars played together was significantly shorter than a year, but I am probably mistaken. I still maintain that virtually no 11 year olds know the Little League district boundary.
It was NOT an all star team. That's the point. It was a team built out of the all stars, played together all year, and then played in a playoff that was for non-stacked teams.
RatBastard wrote:If Hutch does not want the records, I will gladly take them from you and I'll even come pick them up.
I had already fully disclosed that these LPs are not close to collectible condition even though a couple are autographed.

Julian, wrote:RatBastard wrote:I was under the impression the time period that the all stars played together was significantly shorter than a year, but I am probably mistaken. I still maintain that virtually no 11 year olds know the Little League district boundary.
It was NOT an all star team. That's the point. It was a team built out of the all stars, played together all year, and then played in a playoff that was for non-stacked teams.
If one of the kids was getting shipped in from 3 hours away, then OK, but absent some smoking gun I do not believe the kids knew in some widespread way that the lineup was ginned up.
Julian, wrote:RatBastard wrote:I was under the impression the time period that the all stars played together was significantly shorter than a year, but I am probably mistaken. I still maintain that virtually no 11 year olds know the Little League district boundary.
It was NOT an all star team. That's the point. It was a team built out of the all stars, played together all year, and then played in a playoff that was for non-stacked teams.
If one of the kids was getting shipped in from 3 hours away, then OK, but absent some smoking gun I do not believe the kids knew in some widespread way that the lineup was ginned up.
Yada wrote:
Great perspective from an amazing player.
http://www.theplayerstribune.com/left-out/
hutch wrote:Yada wrote:
Great perspective from an amazing player.
http://www.theplayerstribune.com/left-out/
wow..that is really good…
Julian, wrote:
That article has absolutely nothing to do with this cheating scandal at all. It's completely off topic and his point that baseball is expensive is so obvious it didn't need stating.
hutch wrote:What does it have to do with it? He basically tells a story about being poor and posits that the same adults who were cheating are probably heroes to the kids.Julian, wrote:
That article has absolutely nothing to do with this cheating scandal at all. It's completely off topic and his point that baseball is expensive is so obvious it didn't need stating.
uh oh…we got one guy who won't read and one guy who can't read.
hutch wrote:Julian, wrote:
That article has absolutely nothing to do with this cheating scandal at all. It's completely off topic and his point that baseball is expensive is so obvious it didn't need stating.
uh oh…we got one guy who won't read and one guy who can't read.
RatBastard wrote:Back when I actually tried to rad for pleasure
Sidehatch wrote:RatBastard wrote:Back when I actually tried to rad for pleasure
Ok I know this was a typo..but it's frign awesome
For the record…I rad for pleasure everyday!
