Blow, me, Joey
Joined: Unknown
Posts: 0
Re: random . . . randomness
February 15, 2024 at 09:29 PM UTC
#
Dude . . . who knew! They were, SLAMMED! Our poor waitress almost had a nervous breakdown. They ran out everything. But, it was a magical trip back in time.
The pan pizza, still rules. Their wings were excellent, and I nearly orgasmed over the breadsticks.
All in all, it was a dream Valentine date!
Blow, me, Joey
Joined: Unknown
Posts: 0
Re: random . . . randomness
February 17, 2024 at 05:24 AM UTC
#
Gentlemen, do not look dashing, with beards. They never have, and they never will.
The lined areas of the neck left open, always look ridiculous, no matter where you stop.
You are not an animal protecting your skin from the harsh elements, you are a human; get that crap off your face.
grateful
Joined: October 15, 2008 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 11564
Re: random . . . randomness
February 17, 2024 at 02:41 PM UTC
#
And where do you stand on the 5 o'clock shadow? The 3-day stubble?
Sidehatch
Joined: October 04, 2011 at 04:33 AM UTC
Posts: 25687
Re: random . . . randomness
February 17, 2024 at 02:46 PM UTC
#
Good thing I'm not looking to score with walky
Sidehatch
Joined: October 04, 2011 at 04:33 AM UTC
Posts: 25687
Re: random . . . randomness
February 17, 2024 at 03:01 PM UTC
#
Blow, wrote:
Semi-Prime-hatch wrote:
Good thing I'm not looking to score with walky
But, a nice 70's bush downtown; stop my beating heart.
oh and the irony is I'm not afraid to manscape
Blow, me, Joey
Joined: Unknown
Posts: 0
Re: random . . . randomness
February 17, 2024 at 04:06 PM UTC
#
Aren't you all glad, Hutch isn't here?
From in-depth conversations about the complexities of obscure vinyl released 57 years ago . . . to this.
beetsnotbeats
Joined: April 26, 2002 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 5756
Re: random . . . randomness
February 20, 2024 at 12:37 AM UTC
#
Sidehatch
Joined: October 04, 2011 at 04:33 AM UTC
Posts: 25687
Re: random . . . randomness
February 23, 2024 at 03:56 AM UTC
#
“we believe that today’s outage was caused by the application and execution of an incorrect process used as we were expanding our network, not a cyber attack,”
AT&T
beetsnotbeats
Joined: April 26, 2002 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 5756
Re: random . . . randomness
February 28, 2024 at 04:01 AM UTC
#
kosmo
Joined: September 23, 1999 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 16329
Re: random . . . randomness
March 06, 2024 at 07:51 PM UTC
#
not really musicological banter…
Dave Rowntree has been selected as the Labour candidate to run for Parliament
Blow, me, Joey
Joined: Unknown
Posts: 0
Re: random . . . randomness
March 10, 2024 at 09:56 PM UTC
#
We give trillions to any other country on the planet . . . but 10 years after lead poisoning, Flint Michigan residents still haven't seen a penny from $626.25 Million legal settlement.
Gee, I wonder why that is?
Space Freely
Joined: December 13, 2014 at 07:28 PM UTC
Posts: 11019
Re: random . . . randomness
March 10, 2024 at 11:57 PM UTC
#
Blow, wrote:
We give trillions to any other country on the planet . . . but 10 years after lead poisoning, Flint Michigan residents still haven't seen a penny from $626.25 Million legal settlement.
Gee, I wonder why that is?
Which country do we give trillions to and how does that have any effect on Flint legal distribution?
Blow, me, Joey
Joined: Unknown
Posts: 0
Re: random . . . randomness
March 11, 2024 at 12:30 PM UTC
#
According to Google:
"Israel has received hundreds of billions of dollars in U.S. foreign aid in the post–World War II era"
"the United States obligated nearly $78.3 billion to Pakistan between 1948 and 2016"
"U.S. Congress have directed about $75 billion in assistance to Ukraine"
My question was, if we have the funds for other countries, why haven't we paid to help the residents of Flint Hill in our country? Is that a difficult question for you?
Space Freely
Joined: December 13, 2014 at 07:28 PM UTC
Posts: 11019
Re: random . . . randomness
March 11, 2024 at 01:09 PM UTC
#
I don't know. But you said trillions to individual countries, and it's obviously billions. And in the cases you mentioned, less than 100 billion, which is 10% of or less than 10% of your original claim.
I'm not an expert on the case but it appears that the lawsuit wasn't filed against the Federal Government, so why would we expect the federal government to pay the settlement?
Do you think Trump will ever pay the 400 billion penalty her was just levied?
On November 10, 2021, Judge Judith E. Levy of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan granted final approval of a landmark $626.25 million settlement resulting from the class action and individual lawsuits brought on behalf of more than 90,000 Flint residents and businesses against multiple governmental defendants, including the State of Michigan, Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ), and individual defendants, including former Governor Rick Snyder, for their roles in re-directing toxic levels of contaminated water from the Flint River into the City’s drinking water in an effort to save money and their subsequent efforts to try to cover up the crisis.https://www.cohenmilstein.com/case-study/flint-water-crisis-class-action-litigation/
Blow, me, Joey
Joined: Unknown
Posts: 0
Re: random . . . randomness
March 11, 2024 at 01:26 PM UTC
#
Sorry, that my question of humanity shows you only care about word semantics, and not the actual problem of our country wanting to fix the infrastructure, of our county.
Thank God, a brewery wasn't affected.
Space Freely
Joined: December 13, 2014 at 07:28 PM UTC
Posts: 11019
Re: random . . . randomness
March 11, 2024 at 01:55 PM UTC
#
Blow, wrote:
Sorry, that my question of humanity shows you only care about word semantics, and not the actual problem of our country wanting to fix the infrastructure, of our county.
Thank God, a brewery wasn't affected.
Who needs to be paying the Flint settlement money and why aren't they paying?
The final settlement wasn't determined until 2023, and it's the State of Michigan that owes the money, not the US government. Facts matter.
https://www.cbsnews.com/detroit/news/judge-approves-flint-water-settlement/?ftag=CNM-00-10aab4i&_amp=1*1gzpsmu*s_vid*bklDdUtyMmZQSU1oTlVaVld0a0sxVGdVLTFjd0dCQVBfWjNKejR4ckxHanFwYXlUOVlLLWNkZ0hEeGdQWWxBOQ..
Yada
Joined: February 05, 2003 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 12418
Re: random . . . randomness
March 11, 2024 at 02:33 PM UTC
#
Blow, wrote:
According to Google:
"Israel has received hundreds of billions of dollars in U.S. foreign aid in the post–World War II era"
"the United States obligated nearly $78.3 billion to Pakistan between 1948 and 2016"
"U.S. Congress have directed about $75 billion in assistance to Ukraine"
My question was, if we have the funds for other countries, why haven't we paid to help the residents of Flint Hill in our country? Is that a difficult question for you?
[glow=red,2,300][shadow=red,left][move]SPACE[/move][/shadow][/glow]
sweetcell
Joined: July 18, 2006 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 22608
Re: random . . . randomness
March 11, 2024 at 08:42 PM UTC
#
i'm with space on this one.
numbers: if you're going to exaggerate in the name of sensationalism, don't complain when you're called out for sensationalism and exaggeration. if you want others to focus on your main point, don't hide it under false and distracting embellishments.
as space pointed out, it's apples and oranges. funding for foreign countries has nothing to do with the flint settlement, since the latter isn't against the federal government. smells of false outrage.
more generally, we can in fact walk and chew gum. money for infrastructure and foreign support comes from different and unrelated budgets. cutting a dollar from from aid to <insert country here> will not result in an additional dollar for cleaning up flint, so why make the false association? politically expediency, methinks: everyone can get behind opposing the injustice in flint. if you are an anti-globalist/america first/etc, why not latch your wagon to this be damned the lack of actual association?
and finally, those in need of help (and their advocates) shouldn't be kicking others in need of help. why does one never hear, as part of a "hey what about keeping that money here at home" argument, the idea of taxing corporations that don't pay any tax? or the billionaires who pay a lower tax rate than teachers? what about cutting the salary of politicians and use those funds on their constituents?