There are still single seats left for Adams.
Just Announced
LOL @ $45 concert tickets = blowing disposable income
This is an expensive city, people have money here
This is an expensive city, people have money here
Doubtful many of his fans have any friends, so singles should be quite suitable.
Bombay wrote:
There are still single seats left for Adams.
I've probably been to 300 or 400 shows and have never paid that much for a ticket.
fatskippy wrote:
LOL @ $45 concert tickets = blowing disposable income
This is an expensive city, people have money here
The demand for Ryan Adams tickets is inversly proportional to the quality of his work. Do you think there was this much demand for tickets when he toured "Heartbreaker" or "Gold?"
Brian
James wrote:
I've probably been to 300 or 400 shows and have never paid that much for a ticket.fatskippy wrote:
LOL @ $45 concert tickets = blowing disposable income
This is an expensive city, people have money here
That's a blatant lie.
betao wrote:
I highly doubt the tickets will sell out quickly for Kasabian.
Yep, y'all were right. Got my Justice and Kasabian, I'm psyched.
Ok, at least 250, but it could be 300 or 400. I haven't really kept track.
Yada wrote:James wrote:
I've probably been to 300 or 400 shows and have never paid that much for a ticket.fatskippy wrote:
LOL @ $45 concert tickets = blowing disposable income
This is an expensive city, people have money here
That's a blatant lie.
There was a line out the door at Iota.
Brian_Wallace wrote:
The demand for Ryan Adams tickets is inversly proportional to the quality of his work. Do you think there was this much demand for tickets when he toured "Heartbreaker" or "Gold?"
Brian
James wrote:
Ok, at least 250, but it could be 300 or 400. I haven't really kept track.Yada wrote:James wrote:
I've probably been to 300 or 400 shows and have never paid that much for a ticket.fatskippy wrote:
LOL @ $45 concert tickets = blowing disposable income
This is an expensive city, people have money here
That's a blatant lie.
Stick to spending your disposable income on your child and pricey beers at Trader Joe's!
Yada wrote:James wrote:
I've probably been to 300 or 400 shows and have never paid that much for a ticket.fatskippy wrote:
LOL @ $45 concert tickets = blowing disposable income
This is an expensive city, people have money here
That's a blatant lie.
he meant that he's never spent that much on such an over-rated artist. that privilge is reserved for the Old 97's.
Just for the record, your favorite band sucks.
It is really easy to go to hundreds of shows and not spend that much. I've been to a comparable amount and probably can count the shows I paid $40+ to see on one hand.
azaghal1981 wrote:
It is really easy to go to hundreds of shows and not spend that much. I've been to a comparable amount and probably can count the shows I paid $40+ to see on one hand.
I've been to 100's of shows as well, but you definitely at some point in your music going career spend that amount unless you have some sort of thing against a band that's popular or you have a rule of spending more than $40+ on a ticket.
02/12/2012 Die Antwoord
Of course I remember seeing them in a homeland outside of Cape Town years ago for free.
But this is for the rest of you suckers.
Of course I remember seeing them in a homeland outside of Cape Town years ago for free.
But this is for the rest of you suckers.
slappy wrote:
02/12/2012 Die Antwoord
Of course I remember seeing them in a homeland outside of Cape Town years ago for free.
But this is for the rest of you suckers.
+1
slappy wrote:
02/12/2012 Die Antwoord
Of course I remember seeing them in a homeland outside of Cape Town years ago for free.
But this is for the rest of you suckers.
Also, are you reall from South Africa, if so… one of the top three places I've been in the world!
Until the last few years, shows that were $40+ were quite rare. My 400 shows are spread out over nearly 30 years of concert going. When I first started going to shows, you could see bands like Van Halen, Rush, Queen, or Ozzy at the local hockey arena for under $10.
I guess my point was that it seems foolish to pay $45 to see Ryan Adams when you can see someone who's equal or better, for $15. Someone like A.A. Bondy. But I guess for some people, there's no real difference between $15 and $45.
I guess my point was that it seems foolish to pay $45 to see Ryan Adams when you can see someone who's equal or better, for $15. Someone like A.A. Bondy. But I guess for some people, there's no real difference between $15 and $45.
Yada wrote:azaghal1981 wrote:
It is really easy to go to hundreds of shows and not spend that much. I've been to a comparable amount and probably can count the shows I paid $40+ to see on one hand.
I've been to 100's of shows as well, but you definitely at some point in your music going career spend that amount unless you have some sort of thing against a band that's popular or you have a rule of spending more than $40+ on a ticket.
James wrote:
Until the last few years, shows that were $40+ were quite rare. My 400 shows are spread out over nearly 30 years of concert going. When I first started going to shows, you could see bands like Van Halen, Rush, Queen, or Ozzy at the local hockey arena for under $10.
I guess my point was that it seems foolish to pay $45 to see Ryan Adams when you can see someone who's equal or better, for $15. Someone like A.A. Bondy. But I guess for some people, there's no real difference between $15 and $45.Yada wrote:azaghal1981 wrote:
It is really easy to go to hundreds of shows and not spend that much. I've been to a comparable amount and probably can count the shows I paid $40+ to see on one hand.
I've been to 100's of shows as well, but you definitely at some point in your music going career spend that amount unless you have some sort of thing against a band that's popular or you have a rule of spending more than $40+ on a ticket.
we know you are a rich bastard, so stop being so frugal ;D
Yada wrote:slappy wrote:
02/12/2012 Die Antwoord
Of course I remember seeing them in a homeland outside of Cape Town years ago for free.
But this is for the rest of you suckers.
+1
f . . u . . c . . k . . i . . n . . g sweet.